Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
C-pac question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 807924" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>What's been said not only about previous CPAC polls but other polls as well is worth considering but before we do let's look at the coverage of last year's winner in Ron Paul (Ron won again this year too).</p><p> </p><p>[video=youtube;eeCkZyx83m8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eeCkZyx83m8[/video]</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>But what did they say when Ron was no where to be seen at all and how was that coverage given?</p><p> </p><p>[video]http://uk.video.yahoo.com/watch/385420/2310165[/video] </p><p> </p><p>What about the Iowa Straw Poll winner in Mitt Romney?</p><p> </p><p>[video=metacafe;763348/governor_romney_on_winning_the_iowa_straw_poll/]http://www.metacafe.com/watch/763348/governor_romney_on_winning_the_iowa_straw_poll/[/video]</p><p> </p><p>All these polls are BS, are all store bought including Ron's, are nothing more than spin jobs and really meaningless (McCain finished down the line but was the nominee) but these events are polling an audience packed by the candidates with their supporters. To sell this as somehow reflective of true conditions is a bit dishonest to say the least but then we are talking about politics and politicians are we not?</p><p> </p><p>Like the media and it's own hypocracy, I also detect a bit of hypocracy here as well because had the winner been say an Alan West for example, you'd have heard menu plans and place settings being detailed for inauguration night in 2013' but then we all fall for this trap and if we stop doing it, so to will these whitewash events and hopefully a more serious discussion will take place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 807924, member: 2189"] What's been said not only about previous CPAC polls but other polls as well is worth considering but before we do let's look at the coverage of last year's winner in Ron Paul (Ron won again this year too). [video=youtube;eeCkZyx83m8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eeCkZyx83m8[/video] But what did they say when Ron was no where to be seen at all and how was that coverage given? [video]http://uk.video.yahoo.com/watch/385420/2310165[/video] What about the Iowa Straw Poll winner in Mitt Romney? [video=metacafe;763348/governor_romney_on_winning_the_iowa_straw_poll/]http://www.metacafe.com/watch/763348/governor_romney_on_winning_the_iowa_straw_poll/[/video] All these polls are BS, are all store bought including Ron's, are nothing more than spin jobs and really meaningless (McCain finished down the line but was the nominee) but these events are polling an audience packed by the candidates with their supporters. To sell this as somehow reflective of true conditions is a bit dishonest to say the least but then we are talking about politics and politicians are we not? Like the media and it's own hypocracy, I also detect a bit of hypocracy here as well because had the winner been say an Alan West for example, you'd have heard menu plans and place settings being detailed for inauguration night in 2013' but then we all fall for this trap and if we stop doing it, so to will these whitewash events and hopefully a more serious discussion will take place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
C-pac question
Top