Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
California deficit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klein" data-source="post: 800603" data-attributes="member: 23950"><p>Others would call it a birth-defect, maybe even a disease, because some are truely born with the wrong organs.</p><p>So, what's the other option ?</p><p> </p><p>Leave them the way they were born, and treat them with anti-depressions, perhaps some physcratic help, their entire life long ?</p><p>Which would cost more then $20K.</p><p> </p><p>Or let them live a normal life (as they would say), have a man and woman relationship, instead of joining the gay community (which still doesn't make them feel at place).</p><p>Besides, future healthcare costs would be lower, then living a homosexual lifestyle, and as explained in my prior post.</p><p> </p><p>Other countries have recognized this "birth-defect", and are treating it, free of charge.</p><p> </p><p>Here the sugery is only $10.000.</p><p>And, I truely believe for $10K, the benefits outweigh that initial surgery cost.</p><p>Not only future healthcare costs savings for these individuals, but also the benefits for the society all around.</p><p> </p><p>But, I do admit, it should be done, case by case.</p><p>If you end up with a muscular woman with a deep man's voice, and facial hair growth, then no, that's just not right.</p><p>But if they are already femine, and were born with the wrong organs (birth-defect), - yes , sure - they need it !</p><p>(vice versa as well, ofcourse).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klein, post: 800603, member: 23950"] Others would call it a birth-defect, maybe even a disease, because some are truely born with the wrong organs. So, what's the other option ? Leave them the way they were born, and treat them with anti-depressions, perhaps some physcratic help, their entire life long ? Which would cost more then $20K. Or let them live a normal life (as they would say), have a man and woman relationship, instead of joining the gay community (which still doesn't make them feel at place). Besides, future healthcare costs would be lower, then living a homosexual lifestyle, and as explained in my prior post. Other countries have recognized this "birth-defect", and are treating it, free of charge. Here the sugery is only $10.000. And, I truely believe for $10K, the benefits outweigh that initial surgery cost. Not only future healthcare costs savings for these individuals, but also the benefits for the society all around. But, I do admit, it should be done, case by case. If you end up with a muscular woman with a deep man's voice, and facial hair growth, then no, that's just not right. But if they are already femine, and were born with the wrong organs (birth-defect), - yes , sure - they need it ! (vice versa as well, ofcourse). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
California deficit
Top