Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Called ":censored:" by supervisor!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FracusBrown" data-source="post: 761975" data-attributes="member: 29360"><p>When you have two idiots trying the change each others behavior by behaving inappropriately, there are two people in the wrong. If you want to change behavior and come out on top, change your own behavior so that you are not contributing to the inappropriate behavior. When one person is clearly behaving inappropriately and the other is clearly <strong><em>not</em></strong> behaving inappropriately, the person in the wrong is pretty easy to identify. </p><p> </p><p>We're only hearing one side of the story. </p><p> </p><p>It's likely that the supervisor has a story that is somewhat different. </p><p> </p><p>There is a line on both sides, if the line is crossed someone is getting in trouble. In this case, until that "cardinal sin" line is crossed, the supervisor has the advantage when it comes to discipline, work assignment, etc. </p><p> </p><p>This started as someone saying something that someone else didn't like, now both sides are escalating it into something more by playing the "tit for tat" routine. </p><p> </p><p>Two things are certain: </p><p>1) If the behavior continues to escalate, at least one (maybe both) of the participants is going to get into serious trouble.</p><p>2) The person that stops engaging and behaves appropriately at all times is not going to be the one that gets burned.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FracusBrown, post: 761975, member: 29360"] When you have two idiots trying the change each others behavior by behaving inappropriately, there are two people in the wrong. If you want to change behavior and come out on top, change your own behavior so that you are not contributing to the inappropriate behavior. When one person is clearly behaving inappropriately and the other is clearly [B][I]not[/I][/B] behaving inappropriately, the person in the wrong is pretty easy to identify. We're only hearing one side of the story. It's likely that the supervisor has a story that is somewhat different. There is a line on both sides, if the line is crossed someone is getting in trouble. In this case, until that "cardinal sin" line is crossed, the supervisor has the advantage when it comes to discipline, work assignment, etc. This started as someone saying something that someone else didn't like, now both sides are escalating it into something more by playing the "tit for tat" routine. Two things are certain: 1) If the behavior continues to escalate, at least one (maybe both) of the participants is going to get into serious trouble. 2) The person that stops engaging and behaves appropriately at all times is not going to be the one that gets burned. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Called ":censored:" by supervisor!
Top