Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Superteeth2478" data-source="post: 3983426" data-attributes="member: 73024">Apparently it was added to the middle of page 94, amending Article XII, Section 2(b).Rather, not all of that bull<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> justifying what was done (that&#039;s the resolution), but the language &quot;Notwithstanding the above, in the event the master agreement has been approved pursuant to the provisions of this Article, but the members covered by a supplement or rider do not approve the employer’s last, best and final offer, as determined by the master negotiating committee, and the supplemental or rider negotiating committee reports that the members have rejected the supplement or rider because of a provision in the ratified master agreement, then the master negotiating committee shall have the authority to declare the master agreement and all supplements and riders to be in effect.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Superteeth2478, post: 3983426, member: 73024"] Apparently it was added to the middle of page 94, amending Article XII, Section 2(b). Rather, not all of that bull:censored: justifying what was done (that's the resolution), but the language [B]"Notwithstanding the above, in the event the master agreement has been approved pursuant to the provisions of this Article, but the members covered by a supplement or rider do not approve the employer’s last, best and final offer, as determined by the master negotiating committee, and the supplemental or rider negotiating committee reports that the members have rejected the supplement or rider because of a provision in the ratified master agreement, then the master negotiating committee shall have the authority to declare the master agreement and all supplements and riders to be in effect."[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification