Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
CHE?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 305217" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>Nope I was wondering why you picked those two guys I know you had a reason. You could have probably found someone who had political desires like Obama who refused to do this also since this law has been enacted. </p><p> </p><p>I thought maybe you were saying that Washington and Jefferson did not like being a part of the British empire so they violated the laws of the crown and started their own country. Obama does not like being an American so he violates the law and has Diesel claiming that he did not know any better. He has so far proposed almost 1 trillion dollars of new spending and now he says he may not pull our troops out of Iraq. Maybe he does not want to start a new country but he sure says he wants to change many things with this one and none that I can see would be for the better.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Again you pick a couple of men from 200 years ago for a reason and I was just curious what the real reason was. I really do not think that it was because Diesel would like the form of government they envisioned. Heck I don't think Hussein Obama would like it either. </p><p> </p><p>Our Federal government for better or worse looks far different today than it did then. The control it has over our daily lives is much like what they were trying to leave behind.(not exactly but in a different way)</p><p>I thought also maybe you were saying that these men today would advocate the violation of this law. If that is true and I really don't think it is the other parts of government that your fan club love so much would they not want to rid our country of that as well. </p><p> </p><p>Hey I am all for limited Government control of my life, but when people try and tell me someone would make a good president but they are also to stupid to know what to do during the national anthem even a bad version of it is just silly. Heck he could have looked at everyone else on stage and known what to do. I think he knew what to do and he did not want to much like his Pledge of allegiance stance because of the war. </p><p> </p><p>I would want someone running for President to know and follow federal law. This also goes for someone wanting my vote for the Senate or House. </p><p> </p><p>You say to hold Washington and Jefferson to the same standard that I would hold Obama or Clinton or Thompson or McCain or whoever else. Washington and Jefferson are not running for president which is why it peaked my interests to why you picked these two out of the thousands that you could have picked. I still think you have a reason but if you do not want to share I sure can't force you to. Anyway there is plenty for me to dislike about Obama and this is just one small thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 305217, member: 8259"] Nope I was wondering why you picked those two guys I know you had a reason. You could have probably found someone who had political desires like Obama who refused to do this also since this law has been enacted. I thought maybe you were saying that Washington and Jefferson did not like being a part of the British empire so they violated the laws of the crown and started their own country. Obama does not like being an American so he violates the law and has Diesel claiming that he did not know any better. He has so far proposed almost 1 trillion dollars of new spending and now he says he may not pull our troops out of Iraq. Maybe he does not want to start a new country but he sure says he wants to change many things with this one and none that I can see would be for the better. Again you pick a couple of men from 200 years ago for a reason and I was just curious what the real reason was. I really do not think that it was because Diesel would like the form of government they envisioned. Heck I don't think Hussein Obama would like it either. Our Federal government for better or worse looks far different today than it did then. The control it has over our daily lives is much like what they were trying to leave behind.(not exactly but in a different way) I thought also maybe you were saying that these men today would advocate the violation of this law. If that is true and I really don't think it is the other parts of government that your fan club love so much would they not want to rid our country of that as well. Hey I am all for limited Government control of my life, but when people try and tell me someone would make a good president but they are also to stupid to know what to do during the national anthem even a bad version of it is just silly. Heck he could have looked at everyone else on stage and known what to do. I think he knew what to do and he did not want to much like his Pledge of allegiance stance because of the war. I would want someone running for President to know and follow federal law. This also goes for someone wanting my vote for the Senate or House. You say to hold Washington and Jefferson to the same standard that I would hold Obama or Clinton or Thompson or McCain or whoever else. Washington and Jefferson are not running for president which is why it peaked my interests to why you picked these two out of the thousands that you could have picked. I still think you have a reason but if you do not want to share I sure can't force you to. Anyway there is plenty for me to dislike about Obama and this is just one small thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
CHE?
Top