Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Check out: Thoroughbred Teamsters Podcast
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 4178047" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Harassment grievances don’t require a constant or prior behavior to be valid. That is a huge mistake people often make and end up waiting too late to address it.</p><p></p><p>Management acknowledges that ORION, bad loads, and other daily occurrences can slow a driver down and also has the technology to corroborate these issues as well as being able to visually corroborate them.</p><p></p><p>So, when a driver is told his numbers aren’t good enough and then is told to attend a class to be “retrained” on the methods THAT is harassment. They are being singled out based on a number on a report that they know, alone, doesn’t tell the whole story. And while ignoring the fact that many of their hot shots (on paper anyway), although are very fast, are very dangerous and often can’t even get the packages delivered to the correct addresses.</p><p></p><p>The OPs manager acknowledged the potential problems addressed above but is still pursuing the “training” class anyway. That should be filed on immediately regardless of whether or not he/she is just doing what his/her boss ordered.</p><p></p><p>If they simply wanted to “retrain” or refresh us on the methods that could be accomplished during a PCM among everyone instead of singling certain people out. Or, if they really want to fix metrics on a spreadsheet, among other issues, they could actually listen to the drivers and actually attempt to fix the problems that they are pretending to acknowledge exist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overpaid Union Thug, post: 4178047, member: 198"] Harassment grievances don’t require a constant or prior behavior to be valid. That is a huge mistake people often make and end up waiting too late to address it. Management acknowledges that ORION, bad loads, and other daily occurrences can slow a driver down and also has the technology to corroborate these issues as well as being able to visually corroborate them. So, when a driver is told his numbers aren’t good enough and then is told to attend a class to be “retrained” on the methods THAT is harassment. They are being singled out based on a number on a report that they know, alone, doesn’t tell the whole story. And while ignoring the fact that many of their hot shots (on paper anyway), although are very fast, are very dangerous and often can’t even get the packages delivered to the correct addresses. The OPs manager acknowledged the potential problems addressed above but is still pursuing the “training” class anyway. That should be filed on immediately regardless of whether or not he/she is just doing what his/her boss ordered. If they simply wanted to “retrain” or refresh us on the methods that could be accomplished during a PCM among everyone instead of singling certain people out. Or, if they really want to fix metrics on a spreadsheet, among other issues, they could actually listen to the drivers and actually attempt to fix the problems that they are pretending to acknowledge exist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Check out: Thoroughbred Teamsters Podcast
Top