Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Cheney Now Admits To Giving The Order To Shoot Down US Airliner on 9/11
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1108177" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>The decision itself may well have been the correct one but are you missing the deeper point here? On Sept. 16th 2001, Cheney appeared on Meet the Press with Tim Russert and the conversation went like this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At the same time, witnesses on the ground in Pa. reported seeing a military jet yet the gov't continued to deny any military jet in the area. Some people who alleged 93 may have been shotdown were met with scorn for suggesting much less thinking out gov't would do this. Now it turns out the gov't did and those wacko conspiracy theorist were right on that point.</p><p></p><p>So why in those years in power was this not owned and yet now Cheney finds it timely to own it? And in the Fox News video of Cheney with Mike Wallace, Cheney seems to totally own this as if Bush was out of the command loop. Cheney admits the orders came from him and yet no transfer of power from Bush to Cheney had taken place. With Russert in 2001' it was "WE" did this, "WE" did that and now it's "I" did this, "I" did that. Dowd wasn't reporting anything new so much as the fact that the story had thus changed again suggesting Bush was instead out of the loop making Cheney's 2001' statement of "we" false. </p><p></p><p> Are we to believe that Air Force #1 had lost total ability to communicate with the command structure? Are we thus even to assume Bush even had no means of launching a nuke strike had such measures been necessary? Either all we've been told about technology is utterly false on it's face or it raises the specter that was Bush on purpose kept out of the command loop? Another loopy conspiracy theory that evidence now seems to have given legs too.</p><p></p><p>The decision to shoot down or not IMO is not the heart of the issue, the heart of the issue is why say one thing all those years ago and now the story changes yet once again? Why not own it all from the start? Doesn't mean the passengers did not bring down the aircraft but at least the people have the truth. Unless the truth would open doors others don't won't opened?</p><p></p><p>Funny Island that you accuse Washington of having snakes present now and yet you won't consider the fact that Washington has been infested with snakes all along regardless of which party is in power. Telling, very telling!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 1108177, member: 2189"] The decision itself may well have been the correct one but are you missing the deeper point here? On Sept. 16th 2001, Cheney appeared on Meet the Press with Tim Russert and the conversation went like this. At the same time, witnesses on the ground in Pa. reported seeing a military jet yet the gov't continued to deny any military jet in the area. Some people who alleged 93 may have been shotdown were met with scorn for suggesting much less thinking out gov't would do this. Now it turns out the gov't did and those wacko conspiracy theorist were right on that point. So why in those years in power was this not owned and yet now Cheney finds it timely to own it? And in the Fox News video of Cheney with Mike Wallace, Cheney seems to totally own this as if Bush was out of the command loop. Cheney admits the orders came from him and yet no transfer of power from Bush to Cheney had taken place. With Russert in 2001' it was "WE" did this, "WE" did that and now it's "I" did this, "I" did that. Dowd wasn't reporting anything new so much as the fact that the story had thus changed again suggesting Bush was instead out of the loop making Cheney's 2001' statement of "we" false. Are we to believe that Air Force #1 had lost total ability to communicate with the command structure? Are we thus even to assume Bush even had no means of launching a nuke strike had such measures been necessary? Either all we've been told about technology is utterly false on it's face or it raises the specter that was Bush on purpose kept out of the command loop? Another loopy conspiracy theory that evidence now seems to have given legs too. The decision to shoot down or not IMO is not the heart of the issue, the heart of the issue is why say one thing all those years ago and now the story changes yet once again? Why not own it all from the start? Doesn't mean the passengers did not bring down the aircraft but at least the people have the truth. Unless the truth would open doors others don't won't opened? Funny Island that you accuse Washington of having snakes present now and yet you won't consider the fact that Washington has been infested with snakes all along regardless of which party is in power. Telling, very telling! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Cheney Now Admits To Giving The Order To Shoot Down US Airliner on 9/11
Top