Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Box Ox" data-source="post: 5609428" data-attributes="member: 48469">Sounds a lot like the religion of transgenderism in 2023. We already know what its holy books are. Most people will recognize it as wrong at some point in the future.[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.dailywire.com/news/california-bill-would-classify-not-affirming-childs-transgenderism-as-child-abuse[/URL]<h3>California Bill Would Classify Not Affirming Child’s Transgenderism As ‘Child Abuse’</h3>"A recently amended <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/california" target="_blank">California</a> bill would classify not affirming a child’s gender identity by one or both parents as “child abuse.”<a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB957" target="_blank">AB 957</a> was <a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/06/09/california-bill-would-charge-any-parent-doesnt-affirm-transgenderism-child-abuse/" target="_blank">introduced</a> into the California legislature by Assemblymember Lori Wilson (D-Suisun City) and state Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco). The bill rewrites much of the state’s family law and classifies “a parent’s affirmation of the child’s gender identity as part of the health, safety, and welfare of the child.”The bill amends <a href="https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/BTB_23_2O_1.pdf" target="_blank">Section 3011</a> of the Family Code, which deals with child custody disputes, and requires that a court determining the “best interests” of the child must consider affirmation of transgender identity. If a parent were to deny the child’s “gender identity,” it would be a violation of the child’s health, safety, and welfare — equivalent to child abuse.Because the bill changes the definition of what constitutes the “health, safety, and welfare” of a child, any organization interacting with children — including schools, churches, and hospitals — would be required to affirm gender transitions in minors."</blockquote>

Verification