Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Comey testimony 12/07/2018
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3853969" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>All I know is that under the law, which supposedly we're all under, Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State, and then the presumptive President of the United States, to reap tens of millions of Dollars into her and her husband's bank accounts. When it was found that she used a private server to conduct government business on, which was a felony, the seriousness of which was magnified by the finding of top secret documents on, she refused to hand over tens of thousands of emails under subpoena to the body responsible for determining why she was using such a setup. And to make certain they couldn't ever read those emails she had the server "bleach bitted" and had her aides smash all cellphones and blackberries they used to email and text her. Clearly a violation of laws pertaining to obstruction. Numerous felonies committed. And yet exonerated by the FBI director, who's job wasn't to do such, that was the Attorney General's job.</p><p></p><p>Compare and contrast that with the search far and wide to find anything that could possibly rise to the level of an impeachable offense committed by the president. Some of the president's aides and associates have been indicted for various offenses in hopes of getting them to admit something about Trump that condemns him but so far have they actually found anything? Our former Secretary of State put national security on the line and went to great lengths to cover that up. Yawn? Really? But so far, in violation of Mueller's mandate concerning Russia collusion, the worst you can come up with is Trump MAY have violated campaign finance laws to hush up women he played around with? With his own money? The seriousness of which may have embarrassed him and hurt his chances to win the presidency? That's it? This is what the sanctity of the judicial process hangs on when his opponent clearly committed high crimes that would have gotten her impeached if she had won? Assuming, of course, that it wouldn't have been suppressed by her DOJ.</p><p></p><p>Since some here like to ridicule "Jebus" I'm certain you're aware it was Jesus who said, paraphrasing, that you shouldn't worry about the speck in your brother's eye when you have a log in your own. And for the millionth time, if it's shown that Trump actually committed an impeachable offense, then throw the book at him. But if we don't apply the law equally to all in power then we'll continue to get those who serve themselves instead of the people. Is it that hard to understand?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3853969, member: 24302"] All I know is that under the law, which supposedly we're all under, Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State, and then the presumptive President of the United States, to reap tens of millions of Dollars into her and her husband's bank accounts. When it was found that she used a private server to conduct government business on, which was a felony, the seriousness of which was magnified by the finding of top secret documents on, she refused to hand over tens of thousands of emails under subpoena to the body responsible for determining why she was using such a setup. And to make certain they couldn't ever read those emails she had the server "bleach bitted" and had her aides smash all cellphones and blackberries they used to email and text her. Clearly a violation of laws pertaining to obstruction. Numerous felonies committed. And yet exonerated by the FBI director, who's job wasn't to do such, that was the Attorney General's job. Compare and contrast that with the search far and wide to find anything that could possibly rise to the level of an impeachable offense committed by the president. Some of the president's aides and associates have been indicted for various offenses in hopes of getting them to admit something about Trump that condemns him but so far have they actually found anything? Our former Secretary of State put national security on the line and went to great lengths to cover that up. Yawn? Really? But so far, in violation of Mueller's mandate concerning Russia collusion, the worst you can come up with is Trump MAY have violated campaign finance laws to hush up women he played around with? With his own money? The seriousness of which may have embarrassed him and hurt his chances to win the presidency? That's it? This is what the sanctity of the judicial process hangs on when his opponent clearly committed high crimes that would have gotten her impeached if she had won? Assuming, of course, that it wouldn't have been suppressed by her DOJ. Since some here like to ridicule "Jebus" I'm certain you're aware it was Jesus who said, paraphrasing, that you shouldn't worry about the speck in your brother's eye when you have a log in your own. And for the millionth time, if it's shown that Trump actually committed an impeachable offense, then throw the book at him. But if we don't apply the law equally to all in power then we'll continue to get those who serve themselves instead of the people. Is it that hard to understand? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Comey testimony 12/07/2018
Top