Sportello
Well-Known Member
@Old Man Jingles could learn a thing or two about trolling from Comey's testimony.
That was some master baiting.
That was some master baiting.
Mr. Comey . I don't know because I don't know what collusion means. It's a term I haven't heard in my career in the Justice Department, so I don't know.
I knew I could draw you out to say something stupid. Not ignorant, no sir, you are not ignorant.Mr. Comey . I don't know because I don't know what collusion means. It's a term I haven't heard in my career in the Justice Department, so I don't know.
Mr. Mueller would have another have indictment for lying to Congress if he were investigating Comey.
This answer from Comey is at least one of three, truth, misstatement or lie, or a combination.
1. There can be a criminal act of collusion which is can be an element in many antitrust prosecutions, which the Dept. of Justice prosecutes.
Lie or misstatement of fact, you decide.
If Comey was a Trump associate, Mueller would call it a lie and charge accordingly.
2. 'I don't know what collusion means,' "so I don't know.'
The man has a JD from University of Chicago Law, he is
well aware of illegal business practices that the term is used to define or illustrate criminal elements in Antitrust Law.
Mueller would consider this a lie to Congress as well.
I may be ignorant, yet still correct.I knew I could draw you out to say something stupid. Not ignorant, no sir, you are not ignorant.
Forgive me, sir. Perhaps you have misunderstood. I never said you were ignorant. How could you possibly construe my post to be a personal attack?I may be ignorant, yet still correct.
Attack the substance not me.
Was your post simply a personal attack on me? Maybe we should throw it to the booth it is headed to anyway.
Time will tell.
I would also like to add, that if you take Donnie’s statements as fact, you are a fool. That cannot be in dispute. Donnie is a fool.I may be ignorant, yet still correct.
Attack the substance not me.
Was your post simply a personal attack on me? Maybe we should throw it to the booth it is headed to anyway.
Time will tell.
I read the word stupid, as Gump says, "Stupid is as stupid does." I've been reprimanded previously for using "stupid." I am going to be proven correct, I can read the seams on a baseball, or could with my younger eyesight.Forgive me, sir. Perhaps you have misunderstood. I never said you were ignorant. How could you possibly construe my post to be a personal attack?
Correct? Well that remains to be seen. The odds are not tilting in that direction.
I like the ground I’m standing on.
The only statement that has a legal recourse is one under oath.I would also like to add, that if you take Donnie’s statements as fact, you are a fool. That cannot be in dispute. Donnie is a fool.
I would also like to add, that if you take Donnie’s statements as fact, you are a fool. That cannot be in dispute. Donnie is a fool.
He is a mental idiot but that doesn't mean he should have fired Comey. You just got newfied.it was good trump fired him. How can you have someone head the FBI who does not remember things over 200 times. the guy is a mental idiot.
He is a mental idiot but that doesn't mean he should have fired Comey. You just got newfied.
Comey got Gowdy to equate “collusion” with “conspiracy”. Rather masterful actually.The only statement that has a legal recourse is one under oath.
Comey was under oath, we will see what the clowns grilling him will do with it.
You have yet to respond to my initial claims made to your initial post. I know why you haven't. I laid it out in my first response. "I have never heard the term collusion, in my time at the Justice Dept,... BS. I don't know what it is, BS from a guy with a JD.
I don't assume forward thinking during his questioning previously from the clowns that had him under oath, but they have the guy by he short hairs if they want him. previously
Defeat? Did his district go blue?Who really cares what Gowdy has to say anyway? Rather than to go down to a humiliating defeat he chose not to run again. He's going back to so called practicing law which mean lobbying in behalf of any special interest who will give the price he wants.