Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Contract deal soon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nospinzone" data-source="post: 205256" data-attributes="member: 1335"><p><strong>Re: The Sacred Text has spoken.....</strong></p><p></p><p> APWA's initial arguement that set their campaign in motion is the mismanagement of the pension funds, specifically Central States and now the others that have followed suit. Poor enforcement of the contract across the country also adds to the APWA arguement. From what I've read here, people in 705 have taken care of themselves and would probably not be interested in what APWA has to offer. Why would you sell ice to eskimos? The people under the national contract, IMHO, would benefit the most from a change in CBA.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As described in the chapter you've brought to our attention, discretion is left to the Board in determining the necessity of redefining a bargaining unit. But their decision is based on prior history of the unit in question, and whether the unit function has hampered the members ability to fully exercise their rights. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Obviously the NLRB has not found the current defined unit in conflict with the above premise or they would have intervened well before now. So the APWA would have to present a valid arguement that would withstand the requisite desribed above. Your reasoning to break up the current unit just for the sake of giving the APWA some "practice" doesn't hold water.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">I required CPR twice while preparing this post.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/lol.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Lol :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nospinzone, post: 205256, member: 1335"] [B]Re: The Sacred Text has spoken.....[/B] APWA's initial arguement that set their campaign in motion is the mismanagement of the pension funds, specifically Central States and now the others that have followed suit. Poor enforcement of the contract across the country also adds to the APWA arguement. From what I've read here, people in 705 have taken care of themselves and would probably not be interested in what APWA has to offer. Why would you sell ice to eskimos? The people under the national contract, IMHO, would benefit the most from a change in CBA. As described in the chapter you've brought to our attention, discretion is left to the Board in determining the necessity of redefining a bargaining unit. But their decision is based on prior history of the unit in question, and whether the unit function has hampered the members ability to fully exercise their rights. Obviously the NLRB has not found the current defined unit in conflict with the above premise or they would have intervened well before now. So the APWA would have to present a valid arguement that would withstand the requisite desribed above. Your reasoning to break up the current unit just for the sake of giving the APWA some "practice" doesn't hold water. [SIZE=1]I required CPR twice while preparing this post.:lol:[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Contract deal soon?
Top