Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4439154" data-attributes="member: 63706">No results will ever be enough to get them to admit they made and supported the wrong decisions. I have yet to find a predictive model that even calls for stay at home orders for uninfected/unexposed people. It&#039;s like the experts are saying one thing, and policy makers are doing whatever they want and claiming the experts are advising it.A lock down in February would never have happened, one because the numbers weren&#039;t clear (still aren&#039;t really) and, two, there was no time for the propaganda machine to scare the sheep senseless enough to be grateful for being being placed under house arrest for no reason.Most secondary infections occur when people are confined with other people. That&#039;s why there are so many famial clusters. Thanks, government, for actually making things worse while deceiving people into believing they are &quot;safe&quot;. SMGDH.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4439154, member: 63706"] No results will ever be enough to get them to admit they made and supported the wrong decisions. I have yet to find a predictive model that even calls for stay at home orders for uninfected/unexposed people. It's like the experts are saying one thing, and policy makers are doing whatever they want and claiming the experts are advising it. A lock down in February would never have happened, one because the numbers weren't clear (still aren't really) and, two, there was no time for the propaganda machine to scare the sheep senseless enough to be grateful for being being placed under house arrest for no reason. Most secondary infections occur when people are confined with other people. That's why there are so many famial clusters. Thanks, government, for actually making things worse while deceiving people into believing they are "safe". SMGDH. [/QUOTE]

Verification