Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4494722" data-attributes="member: 63706">I&#039;ll save everyone a waste of 5 minutes and summarize this garbage opinion piece:Author is intellectual &#039;cause reasons. Used to be conservative now middle left &#039;cause Iraq war and religious people&nbsp; [I always enjoy people blaming others for their own ideological shift]. Due to author&#039;s pedigree he is uniquely qualified to spew extremely vague sentiments of his dissatisfaction with people who don&#039;t agree with him, while never actually stating any facts or presenting any support for his views. Because he is a self-described intellectual we are expected to accept his views as unassailable. He goes on to accuse conservative news outlet of doing the exact same things that liberal media are always guilty of.I guess what&#039;s good for the goose is not good for the gander. You can literally replace every &quot;conservative&quot; with &quot;liberal&quot; in this editorial and it would not significantly change the meaningful content. Why do people keep linking to absolute garbage opinion pieces that do nothing to support their arguments? It&#039;s like saying, &quot;here is some random dude who says stuff I like. You should agree with me now... hurr de durr. Hyuck hyuck.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4494722, member: 63706"] I'll save everyone a waste of 5 minutes and summarize this garbage opinion piece: Author is intellectual 'cause reasons. Used to be conservative now middle left 'cause Iraq war and religious people [I always enjoy people blaming others for their own ideological shift]. Due to author's pedigree he is uniquely qualified to spew extremely vague sentiments of his dissatisfaction with people who don't agree with him, while never actually stating any facts or presenting any support for his views. Because he is a self-described intellectual we are expected to accept his views as unassailable. He goes on to accuse conservative news outlet of doing the exact same things that liberal media are always guilty of. I guess what's good for the goose is not good for the gander. You can literally replace every "conservative" with "liberal" in this editorial and it would not significantly change the meaningful content. Why do people keep linking to absolute garbage opinion pieces that do nothing to support their arguments? It's like saying, "here is some random dude who says stuff I like. You should agree with me now... hurr de durr. Hyuck hyuck." [/QUOTE]

Verification