Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Coronavirus
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4565383" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>The data is right on google, when you search corona cases. Look at the graph for the entire US, and look at the graph for the New England region. It follows the same trajectory. And the largest spike happened after the re-openings. You can try to blame it on the reopenings themselves, but with the way we know the virus spreads, the lock downs are the more likely cause.</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry if you don't like reading. It isn't always possible to encapsulate large ideas into 144 characters.</p><p></p><p>I don't trust China, but the familial clusters are supported by the data, and what is known about how respiratory illnesses spread. If the information presented lines up with what I already know, I am more likely to trust it. Maybe it's confirmation bias, but I do try to counter it with opposing information. I have not found any opposing data to counter the familial cluster idea. Do you know of any?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4565383, member: 63706"] The data is right on google, when you search corona cases. Look at the graph for the entire US, and look at the graph for the New England region. It follows the same trajectory. And the largest spike happened after the re-openings. You can try to blame it on the reopenings themselves, but with the way we know the virus spreads, the lock downs are the more likely cause. I'm sorry if you don't like reading. It isn't always possible to encapsulate large ideas into 144 characters. I don't trust China, but the familial clusters are supported by the data, and what is known about how respiratory illnesses spread. If the information presented lines up with what I already know, I am more likely to trust it. Maybe it's confirmation bias, but I do try to counter it with opposing information. I have not found any opposing data to counter the familial cluster idea. Do you know of any? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Coronavirus
Top