Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Coronavirus
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4568778" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>Source? This claim is basically the exact opposite of everything I have read.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree with this, for the small portion of the population at high risk. But even some people in the high risk category have had relatively mild cases. I still say it should be up to the individual to determine the level of risk they are comfortable with. The faster the low risk group reaches herd immunity, the sooner the high risk population will be protected.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The virus doesn't care about the chain-link fence you have strapped to your face. Or is this about the fetish again?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't see a problem with doing this for very large events, like concerts and what not, but only very frightened people will comply with this for very long. Better to let people decide the level of risk they are comfortable with, and get going on herd immunity to protect the high risk population. The longer we draw this out, the more people will die, or the same amount will die no matter what we do, whichever.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, set each other on fire? Or how about just letting people decide for themselves the level of risk they are comfortable with? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree, many large outbreaks might have been avoided if hvac systems cycled fresh air more often.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree with this as well. People who experience GI symptoms tend to have less severe cases. Maybe we should look into doing fecal transplants for high risk people so they'll have less severe cases?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just so long as we aren't pepper spraying people who aren't getting enough sun. Those selfish introverts, staying inside all the time, killing people with their low vitamin d levels.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a lie they keep telling to get people to accept the absurd actions they are forcing. We know most of what we need to in order to formulate effective policy. Just about everything that has been recommended and done so far has made things worse, because they are ignoring the people who have gotten everything right so far.</p><p></p><p>Also, testing and tracing aren't the key to getting through the pandemic.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200506/covid-19-why-we-cant-test-our-way-out-of-this[/URL]</p><p></p><p>We've reached the peak on average across the nation, now we're on the downhill slide. August 25th, it'll be pretty much over. Get ready to get snuggly this winter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4568778, member: 63706"] Source? This claim is basically the exact opposite of everything I have read. I agree with this, for the small portion of the population at high risk. But even some people in the high risk category have had relatively mild cases. I still say it should be up to the individual to determine the level of risk they are comfortable with. The faster the low risk group reaches herd immunity, the sooner the high risk population will be protected. The virus doesn't care about the chain-link fence you have strapped to your face. Or is this about the fetish again? I don't see a problem with doing this for very large events, like concerts and what not, but only very frightened people will comply with this for very long. Better to let people decide the level of risk they are comfortable with, and get going on herd immunity to protect the high risk population. The longer we draw this out, the more people will die, or the same amount will die no matter what we do, whichever. So, set each other on fire? Or how about just letting people decide for themselves the level of risk they are comfortable with? I agree, many large outbreaks might have been avoided if hvac systems cycled fresh air more often. I agree with this as well. People who experience GI symptoms tend to have less severe cases. Maybe we should look into doing fecal transplants for high risk people so they'll have less severe cases? Just so long as we aren't pepper spraying people who aren't getting enough sun. Those selfish introverts, staying inside all the time, killing people with their low vitamin d levels. This is a lie they keep telling to get people to accept the absurd actions they are forcing. We know most of what we need to in order to formulate effective policy. Just about everything that has been recommended and done so far has made things worse, because they are ignoring the people who have gotten everything right so far. Also, testing and tracing aren't the key to getting through the pandemic. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200506/covid-19-why-we-cant-test-our-way-out-of-this[/URL] We've reached the peak on average across the nation, now we're on the downhill slide. August 25th, it'll be pretty much over. Get ready to get snuggly this winter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Coronavirus
Top