Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4633073" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>What data? The laboratory tests? The anecdotal "observational studies"? The made up statistical analyses? The empirical data as gathered through random control tests shows that there is no evidence that masks slow the spread of ILI. You know why random controlled studies are more reliable than all the other ones I listed? Because they eliminate bias. Scientists have expectations just like anyone else, and they interpret data through their own value systems. Double bilnd random controlled studies are the most reliable source of data that science has. But you knew that right? Nope, 'cause if you did, you would understand why the data does not show that masks slow the spread of ILI.</p></blockquote><p></p>