Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4857392" data-attributes="member: 63706">You assume that people disagreeing with your take are discounting you, or the research you&#039;ve done. I asked for your evidence that variants have been isolated, still waiting on that one. You are free to assume whatever you want of me, I was honest about how I formed my opinion on the India narrative, I&#039;ll be happy to change my mind with some reliable evidence. You saying it was&#039;t imported (or as much as other places) last year doesn&#039;t even fit with the official narrative, so I wouldn&#039;t mind hearing what makes you think that was the case.I assume the assumptions I make about anyone or anything are at very least not the whole story. I am ok with my assumptions being challenged without feeling like I am being personally attacked. I don&#039;t even care that much if people straight up insult me, it&#039;s counterproductive, but I&#039;ll give as good as I get.If you can come up with some good reasons for believing the official narrative on India, considering the official narrative is almost always a lie, and more than your conjecture, or telling me you read something that supports your position, I will give your take the credence it deserves. Otherwise, I have no reason to accept your views over mine. Remember, you came after me on this India thing. You don&#039;t like my reasoning for having the opinions I have, that&#039;s fine. Don&#039;t feel bad if I don&#039;t accept your reasons for your opinions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4857392, member: 63706"] You assume that people disagreeing with your take are discounting you, or the research you've done. I asked for your evidence that variants have been isolated, still waiting on that one. You are free to assume whatever you want of me, I was honest about how I formed my opinion on the India narrative, I'll be happy to change my mind with some reliable evidence. You saying it was't imported (or as much as other places) last year doesn't even fit with the official narrative, so I wouldn't mind hearing what makes you think that was the case. I assume the assumptions I make about anyone or anything are at very least not the whole story. I am ok with my assumptions being challenged without feeling like I am being personally attacked. I don't even care that much if people straight up insult me, it's counterproductive, but I'll give as good as I get. If you can come up with some good reasons for believing the official narrative on India, considering the official narrative is almost always a lie, and more than your conjecture, or telling me you read something that supports your position, I will give your take the credence it deserves. Otherwise, I have no reason to accept your views over mine. Remember, you came after me on this India thing. You don't like my reasoning for having the opinions I have, that's fine. Don't feel bad if I don't accept your reasons for your opinions. [/QUOTE]

Verification