Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4857759" data-attributes="member: 63706">Who&#039;s playing word games? I didn&#039;t change my evidence from &quot;increased cremations&quot; to &quot;increased deaths&quot;, that was you. I explained that the one does not necessarily follow from the other, and you just called me a paranoid conspiracy theorist. That&#039;s not very constructive.I explained why I doubt covid numbers. But you couldn&#039;t address those reasons.It&#039;s not important to me to quash anything, although I don&#039;t like being lied to. It&#039;s important to me to have good evidence. If good evidence is hard to find, good reasoning will do, preferably I would have both. Just because I don&#039;t accept poor evidence and reasoning as the basis for forming my opinions doesn&#039;t mean It&#039;s important for me to quash everything.I remind you, again, that you came after me about my India comment. You were the voluntary enforcer of the official narrative, and when I questioned you about it, you not only refused to provide credible evidence, you act like I&#039;m the one being unreasonable. It seems to me more like you&#039;re the one who has a thing with quashing stuff you don&#039;t agree with. Sorry, your crocodile tears don&#039;t move me a millimeter.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4857759, member: 63706"] Who's playing word games? I didn't change my evidence from "increased cremations" to "increased deaths", that was you. I explained that the one does not necessarily follow from the other, and you just called me a paranoid conspiracy theorist. That's not very constructive. I explained why I doubt covid numbers. But you couldn't address those reasons. It's not important to me to quash anything, although I don't like being lied to. It's important to me to have good evidence. If good evidence is hard to find, good reasoning will do, preferably I would have both. Just because I don't accept poor evidence and reasoning as the basis for forming my opinions doesn't mean It's important for me to quash everything. I remind you, again, that you came after me about my India comment. You were the voluntary enforcer of the official narrative, and when I questioned you about it, you not only refused to provide credible evidence, you act like I'm the one being unreasonable. It seems to me more like you're the one who has a thing with quashing stuff you don't agree with. Sorry, your crocodile tears don't move me a millimeter. [/QUOTE]

Verification