Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4946344" data-attributes="member: 63706">Not without due process, and burden of proof is on society that any such restraint is necessary, and only for such a time as is necessary. Thanks to the 5th amendment, a person can&#039;t be conpelled to participate in his own prosecution. A vaccine is long term, can&#039;t be undone, and may harm the individual, there is no justification for forced vaccination.&quot;Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery, and the Supreme Court long made clear &#039;no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others.&#039;&quot; <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/141/250" target="_blank">UNION PAC. RY. CO. v. BOTSFORD.</a>&quot;Demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business.&quot;[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/questions-and-answers-enforcement-guidance-disability-related-inquiries-and-medical[/URL]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4946344, member: 63706"] Not without due process, and burden of proof is on society that any such restraint is necessary, and only for such a time as is necessary. Thanks to the 5th amendment, a person can't be conpelled to participate in his own prosecution. A vaccine is long term, can't be undone, and may harm the individual, there is no justification for forced vaccination. "Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery, and the Supreme Court long made clear 'no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others.'" [URL="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/141/250"]UNION PAC. RY. CO. v. BOTSFORD.[/URL] "Demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/questions-and-answers-enforcement-guidance-disability-related-inquiries-and-medical[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification