Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Elections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 944610" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>On the one hand, you could say vague but could the truth be something that scares the hell out of democrats/republicans, conservative/liberals alike? What if people are beginning to abandon life on the books for a life <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/12/our_off_the_books_economy.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">off the books</span></a>? Before you balk at such assertion, people have to eat and survive and there are many well educated people who find themselves in situations where the "on the books" economy has cast them aside. I know a number of folks who run off the book operations in which several I do business with on a cash basis and as such I also get a nice price discount over using "on the book" resources. </p><p></p><p>I think one of the reasons in the last few years that gov't policing of the cash economy has stepped up is they know and see the trends and they also know they can't stop it. On a global scale, off the books, black market, agorism or what some call <a href="http://www.freakonomics.com/2011/11/01/the-black-market-is-the-second-largest-economy-in-the-world/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">System D</span></a> has grown so big that sourced together it ranks as the 2nd largest economy in the world. It's so big now that to swat it out would have devastating consequences for "on the book" companies, many of them are companies that underpin national and even international economics. Don't think for one minute that both UPS and FedEx don't benefit from "off the book" businesses!</p><p></p><p>Topdown hierarchical controlled nationstate economics is dying and it's ability to even sustain itself going forward is seriously in question. The bottomup market entrepreneur and just the average worker are pushing back with ever increasing force. Dr. Cocteau is at least in secret realizing he can't kill Edgar Friendly because to do so would undercut his profits at least in the short term if not for all time. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/28/black_market_global_economy?page=full" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">The real Occupy movement</span></a> never was in an American city park or at a gov't building but instead is in neighborhoods and towns not only across America but across the planet. The epoch of man's time with nationstates, state aggression and force is coming to an end and the next epoch we are starting to transition into is a society without boundaries or limitations other than what free men and women in voluntary cooperation agree too. National scale elections followed by their non-voluntary, compulsory demands of people will come to end as well because why would you need them(and a welcomed end it is) to be replaced by local cooperative peoples more in line with the idea of particaptory democracy where group policy must be group unanimous or not at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 944610, member: 2189"] On the one hand, you could say vague but could the truth be something that scares the hell out of democrats/republicans, conservative/liberals alike? What if people are beginning to abandon life on the books for a life [URL="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/12/our_off_the_books_economy.html"][COLOR=#ff0000]off the books[/COLOR][/URL]? Before you balk at such assertion, people have to eat and survive and there are many well educated people who find themselves in situations where the "on the books" economy has cast them aside. I know a number of folks who run off the book operations in which several I do business with on a cash basis and as such I also get a nice price discount over using "on the book" resources. I think one of the reasons in the last few years that gov't policing of the cash economy has stepped up is they know and see the trends and they also know they can't stop it. On a global scale, off the books, black market, agorism or what some call [URL="http://www.freakonomics.com/2011/11/01/the-black-market-is-the-second-largest-economy-in-the-world/"][COLOR=#ff0000]System D[/COLOR][/URL] has grown so big that sourced together it ranks as the 2nd largest economy in the world. It's so big now that to swat it out would have devastating consequences for "on the book" companies, many of them are companies that underpin national and even international economics. Don't think for one minute that both UPS and FedEx don't benefit from "off the book" businesses! Topdown hierarchical controlled nationstate economics is dying and it's ability to even sustain itself going forward is seriously in question. The bottomup market entrepreneur and just the average worker are pushing back with ever increasing force. Dr. Cocteau is at least in secret realizing he can't kill Edgar Friendly because to do so would undercut his profits at least in the short term if not for all time. [URL="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/28/black_market_global_economy?page=full"][COLOR=#ff0000]The real Occupy movement[/COLOR][/URL] never was in an American city park or at a gov't building but instead is in neighborhoods and towns not only across America but across the planet. The epoch of man's time with nationstates, state aggression and force is coming to an end and the next epoch we are starting to transition into is a society without boundaries or limitations other than what free men and women in voluntary cooperation agree too. National scale elections followed by their non-voluntary, compulsory demands of people will come to end as well because why would you need them(and a welcomed end it is) to be replaced by local cooperative peoples more in line with the idea of particaptory democracy where group policy must be group unanimous or not at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Elections
Top