Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="toonertoo" data-source="post: 1136403" data-attributes="member: 1944">Would you like to name which of this pathetic bunch has their priorities backwards?&nbsp; Quite judgemental on your part.&nbsp; It is a fact, that the truth has been covered up, and we would like to know why.&nbsp; Not one of the witnesses said there was not enough time for some back up to get there.&nbsp; A flyover would have sent the attackers scurrying for cover.&nbsp; I never heard them say the event was over long before any help could be sent.&nbsp; They were told not to go by Someone.&nbsp; Us pathetics who do not worship the ground our government walks on would like to know who that was,&nbsp; and why.&nbsp; I have noticed that most of us pathetics, post our views without namecalling.&nbsp; I think it is pathetic when&nbsp; multitudes disagree with you, that for some reason you get to be judge and jury on our intelligence.&nbsp; No one reports you any more because most&nbsp; just ignore you.&nbsp; I happen to think this is an important topic so I keep reading it.&nbsp; I could appreciate your opinion, if you could do it without slander.&nbsp; But that&#039;s just you, you need to throw the insult in, because for some strange, deranged reason, you think it solidifies your point.&nbsp; It don&#039;t.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="toonertoo, post: 1136403, member: 1944"] Would you like to name which of this pathetic bunch has their priorities backwards? Quite judgemental on your part. It is a fact, that the truth has been covered up, and we would like to know why. Not one of the witnesses said there was not enough time for some back up to get there. A flyover would have sent the attackers scurrying for cover. I never heard them say the event was over long before any help could be sent. They were told not to go by [B]Someone[/B]. Us pathetics who do not worship the ground our government walks on would like to know who that was, and why. I have noticed that most of us [B]pathetics, [/B]post our views without namecalling. I think it is pathetic when multitudes disagree with you, that for some reason you get to be judge and jury on our intelligence. No one reports you any more because most just ignore you. I happen to think this is an important topic so I keep reading it. I could appreciate your opinion, if you could do it without slander. But that's just you, you need to throw the insult in, because for some strange, deranged reason, you think it solidifies your point. It don't. [/QUOTE]

Verification