Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Embassy Attacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="oldngray" data-source="post: 1317275" data-attributes="member: 45230"><p>Also contained in the 41 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch is a Sep. 12, 2012 email from Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. In this communication, <strong>Knopf informs Rice that senior officials had already dubbed the Benghazi attack as “complex” and planned in advance. Despite this information, Rice still insisted that attacks were “spontaneous.</strong></p><p>Ed Morrissey <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/wapo-three-pinocchios-for-wh-spin-on-benghazi-e-mails/" target="_blank">reminds us</a> that the White House claimed to have released "all" of its emails on Benghazi nearly a year ago. Gabe Malor asks the <a href="https://twitter.com/gabrielmalor/statuses/461192907991838720" target="_blank">right question</a>: Why are we just seeing these ones now? Now, on substance, the first email embedded above reveals a White House in intense spin mode after a <a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/01/15/benghazi-report-n1779444" target="_blank">preventable terrorist attack</a> that claimed the lives of four Americans, including a sitting Ambassador. We knew that Hillary Clinton's <a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/05/16/benghazi-new-emails-confirm-state-dept-drove-political-edits-to-talking-points-n1598053" target="_blank">State Department</a> and <a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/04/update-testimony-reveals-more-contradictions-on-benghazi-talking-points-evolution-n1818546" target="_blank">the CIA</a> were involved in the administration's historical revisionism surrounding this attack. We now know for certain that top White House officials were in the loop, too. Ben Rhodes outlines four bullet points in his memorandum, the first three of which are misleading and/or false</p><p> just an excerpt. Read the rest in the link and try to disprove instead of deflect the facts.</p><p><a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/29/benghazi-email-n1831085" target="_blank">http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/29/benghazi-email-n1831085</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="oldngray, post: 1317275, member: 45230"] Also contained in the 41 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch is a Sep. 12, 2012 email from Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. In this communication, [B]Knopf informs Rice that senior officials had already dubbed the Benghazi attack as “complex” and planned in advance. Despite this information, Rice still insisted that attacks were “spontaneous.[/B] Ed Morrissey [URL='http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/wapo-three-pinocchios-for-wh-spin-on-benghazi-e-mails/']reminds us[/URL] that the White House claimed to have released "all" of its emails on Benghazi nearly a year ago. Gabe Malor asks the [URL='https://twitter.com/gabrielmalor/statuses/461192907991838720']right question[/URL]: Why are we just seeing these ones now? Now, on substance, the first email embedded above reveals a White House in intense spin mode after a [URL='http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/01/15/benghazi-report-n1779444']preventable terrorist attack[/URL] that claimed the lives of four Americans, including a sitting Ambassador. We knew that Hillary Clinton's [URL='http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/05/16/benghazi-new-emails-confirm-state-dept-drove-political-edits-to-talking-points-n1598053']State Department[/URL] and [URL='http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/04/update-testimony-reveals-more-contradictions-on-benghazi-talking-points-evolution-n1818546']the CIA[/URL] were involved in the administration's historical revisionism surrounding this attack. We now know for certain that top White House officials were in the loop, too. Ben Rhodes outlines four bullet points in his memorandum, the first three of which are misleading and/or false just an excerpt. Read the rest in the link and try to disprove instead of deflect the facts. [url]http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/29/benghazi-email-n1831085[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Embassy Attacks
Top
