Epstein's List

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
What do you mean by this?
I thought it was self-explanatory.

It makes me think that there’s nothing there worth anything. Or it would’ve already been exposed.

There’s also a chance there’s a lot there and neither side wanted it exposed but I’m leaning towards the first option a lot more.

Mostly because nothing that’s ever been released has been groundbreaking in any way… JFK files anyone?

At this point, you would have to believe that the Biden administration sat on a wealth of knowledge about a lot of pedophiles and did nothing.
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
Mostly because nothing that’s ever been released has been groundbreaking in any way… JFK files anyone?
I don’t know about that…

JFK files showed:

“Declassified JFK files revealed that the CIA was actively monitoring Lee Harvey Oswald months before the assassination—especially during his time in Mexico City in 1963.
  • Why it matters: Oswald met with Cuban and Soviet officials, including KGB agents, yet the CIA did not disclose this knowledge to the Warren Commission. This undermines the official narrative that Oswald was a lone actor who just “appeared.”
  • Groundbreaking Insight: The CIA withheld critical intelligence that might have prevented the assassination or altered the official account of events.”
Som other pretty crazy things that were released I would consider “groundbreaking”

Project MK ultra:

“What was released? In the 1970s (and more recently), thousands of documents on MK-Ultra, a secret CIA program that tested LSD, electroshock, and other methods for behavioral control and interrogation.
  • Why it matters: These documents confirmed the non-consensual drugging and abuse of U.S. citizens, prisoners, and hospital patients. Some subjects died.
  • Groundbreaking Insight: The U.S. government ran illegal mind-control experiments on civilians—previously dismissed as conspiracy theories.”



Operation Northwoods (False Flag Proposals)








  • What was released? Declassified Joint Chiefs of Staff documents from 1962 show that the Pentagon proposed faking terrorist attacks (e.g., blowing up a U.S. ship or staging hijackings) to justify war against Cuba.
  • Why it matters: These were official U.S. military plans to commit acts of terrorism against Americans as a pretext for war.
  • Groundbreaking Insight: Proven willingness of U.S. leadership to consider extreme deception to achieve foreign policy goals.








Tuskegee Syphilis Study (Delayed Disclosure)








  • What was released? Documents and testimonies from the 1970s exposed a decades-long U.S. Public Health Service experiment in which Black men with syphilis were left untreated without their consent.
  • Why it matters: Hundreds were harmed or died, and families were left uninformed for generations.
  • Groundbreaking Insight: Proof of systemic racial medical abuse in modern U.S. history—leading to widespread mistrust.





Gulf of Tonkin Deception (Vietnam War Entry)








  • What was released? NSA documents declassified in the early 2000s showed that the second attack in the Gulf of Tonkin (August 4, 1964)—used to justify full-scale entry into Vietnam—never happened.
  • Why it matters: It proved the U.S. entered a catastrophic war based on false or manipulated information.
  • Groundbreaking Insight: Official acknowledgment that key justifications for the Vietnam War were knowingly based on bad intel.
 

BadIdeaGuy

Keyboard Kenny
Staff member
I thought it was self-explanatory.

It makes me think that there’s nothing there worth anything. Or it would’ve already been exposed.

There’s also a chance there’s a lot there and neither side wanted it exposed but I’m leaning towards the first option a lot more.

Mostly because nothing that’s ever been released has been groundbreaking in any way… JFK files anyone?

At this point, you would have to believe that the Biden administration sat on a wealth of knowledge about a lot of pedophiles and did nothing.
Queue the clamoring that Biden's justice department was independent.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
I thought it was self-explanatory.

It makes me think that there’s nothing there worth anything. Or it would’ve already been exposed.

There’s also a chance there’s a lot there and neither side wanted it exposed but I’m leaning towards the first option a lot more.

Mostly because nothing that’s ever been released has been groundbreaking in any way… JFK files anyone?

At this point, you would have to believe that the Biden administration sat on a wealth of knowledge about a lot of pedophiles and did nothing.
Probably so. If they released a nothing burger then everyone will still say they're covering up the real truth. Can't win. But I bet going forward they'll be a lot more careful instead of over promising and not delivering.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member

Newly obtained photos and a video from 1993 and 1999 of Trump and Epstein together. Apparently pretty chummy, huh?

The reporter that obtained these photos called the president today and spoke with him for about "30 seconds". He said that president responded to the question about these newly unearthed photos/video with the words "you've got to be kidding me" and proceeded to call CNN "fake news" and hanging up on the reporter.
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
IMG_3624.jpeg


This report from Trumps DOJ in his first term about ghislane Maxwell, says she has a willingness to “brazenly lie under oath about her conduct” and “strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes”

Interesting that that’s the person they want to speak during this controversy instead of just releasing the files
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member

A conversation with Mark Epstein, Jeffrey's brother.

Mark Epstein confirms that he personally witnessed Trump and Epstein's close friendship.

Mark Epstein calls this administration's answers about Trump and Epstein's relationship 'blatant lies'.

Mark Epstein, as previously reported, believes that his brother was murdered in his jail cell.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
View attachment 527045

This report from Trumps DOJ in his first term about ghislane Maxwell, says she has a willingness to “brazenly lie under oath about her conduct” and “strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes”

Interesting that that’s the person they want to speak during this controversy instead of just releasing the files
I wouldn't believe a single word she says. She has shown us that she's an abject liar already, without any question.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
View attachment 527045

This report from Trumps DOJ in his first term about ghislane Maxwell, says she has a willingness to “brazenly lie under oath about her conduct” and “strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes”

Interesting that that’s the person they want to speak during this controversy instead of just releasing the files
You got the schmuck vote
 
Top