UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Revenge is a dish best served cold….The Democrat party is facing annihilation at the hands of the person They thought they were going to annihilate.
Revenge is a dish best served cold….The Democrat party is facing annihilation at the hands of the person They thought they were going to annihilate.
Link it.She has showed us a lot.
You know he is upset since he was s losing on everything when it come to TrumpSo Epstein is a load of bull? Perhaps
If it was a Democrat it would be gospel for youLink it.
View attachment 527812View attachment 527813
Ghislane Maxwell is now appealing to the Supreme Court to toss out her conviction, saying the U.S. violated its own immunity agreement it gave when first prosecuting Epstein
And just a reminder, the prosecutor who gave Epstein the sweet heart deal and included immunity for all his co-conspirators was then later hired to work in Trumps administration
View attachment 527812View attachment 527813
Ghislane Maxwell is now appealing to the Supreme Court to toss out her conviction, saying the U.S. violated its own immunity agreement it gave when first prosecuting Epstein
And just a reminder, the prosecutor who gave Epstein the sweet heart deal and included immunity for all his co-conspirators was then later hired to work in Trumps administration
You should open a bookHere we go.
![]()
Ghislaine Maxwell urges Supreme Court to hear her criminal appeal
The new filing responds to a Justice Department brief that argued the justices should leave Maxwell's criminal convictions in place.www.nbcnews.com
7/28/25
"Markus said in a statement that he was appealing to both the Supreme Court and President Donald Trump for help with Maxwell's case. The Supreme Court could overturn Maxwell's conviction in New York and order a new federal trial. Trump could commute Maxwell's sentence or pardon her.
"President Trump built his legacy in part on the power of a deal—and surely he would agree that when the United States gives its word, it must stand by it," Markus said.
"We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the President himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein’s crimes," he added, "especially when the government promised she would not be prosecuted."
Yep, Acosta was also a huge pharmaceutical guy.View attachment 527812View attachment 527813
Ghislane Maxwell is now appealing to the Supreme Court to toss out her conviction, saying the U.S. violated its own immunity agreement it gave when first prosecuting Epstein
And just a reminder, the prosecutor who gave Epstein the sweet heart deal and included immunity for all his co-conspirators was then later hired to work in Trumps administration
If she gave good information, she’ll probably get a pardon anyway.You should open a book
Here we go.
![]()
Ghislaine Maxwell urges Supreme Court to hear her criminal appeal
The new filing responds to a Justice Department brief that argued the justices should leave Maxwell's criminal convictions in place.www.nbcnews.com
7/28/25
"Markus said in a statement that he was appealing to both the Supreme Court and President Donald Trump for help with Maxwell's case. The Supreme Court could overturn Maxwell's conviction in New York and order a new federal trial. Trump could commute Maxwell's sentence or pardon her.
"President Trump built his legacy in part on the power of a deal—and surely he would agree that when the United States gives its word, it must stand by it," Markus said.
"We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the President himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein’s crimes," he added, "especially when the government promised she would not be prosecuted."
If she gave good information, she’ll probably get a pardon anyway.
Which you would be against, right?If she gave good information, she’ll probably get a pardon anyway.
Why? I mean if she gave bad information yeah but if she didn’t, and the president wants to it’s his decision how does it affect me?Which you would be against, right?
Lmao unbelievableWhy? I mean if she gave bad information yeah but if she didn’t, and the president wants to it’s his decision how does it affect me?
It’s unbelievable that presidents give pardons? Not really there’s been a lot of pardon that happened that I don’t agree with what choice do I have?Lmao unbelievable
Biden hardly pardoned anyone…..Lmao unbelievable
We’re talking about someone trafficking 14 year old kids to be raped…It’s unbelievable that presidents give pardons? Not really there’s been a lot of pardon that happened that I don’t agree with what choice do I have?
You act like this is some unprecedented thing. Prosecutors give leniency and governors give pardons all the time for information for all kinds of crimes.
Well, according to you, there’s bigger fish to fry. Gotta get that information somehow. Unfortunately, she has some information that the government might possibly need.. and if she doesn’t, I guess she’s staying thereWe’re talking about someone trafficking 14 year old kids to be raped…
Was he tried and convicted? Innocent until proven guilty, and he was not tried.We’re talking about someone trafficking 14 year old kids to be raped…
The weed is turning his brain to mush. Same story every day. RidiculousWell, according to you, there’s bigger fish to fry. Gotta get that information somehow. Unfortunately, she has some information that the government might possibly need.. and if she doesn’t, I guess she’s staying there