Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ethics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ok2bclever" data-source="post: 71805" data-attributes="member: 1356"><p>I know there is a huge bush fan club here so this will probably not be well received, but remember this administration ran a campaign about bringing ethics and trust back to the White House?</p><p></p><p>Things like how bush said he'd can anyone involved in the leak.</p><p></p><p>We know Libby was involved, anyone truly believe Rove who's fingers and suggestions are in anything and everything involving this administration <em>wasn't in the knowledge</em> <em><u>and </u>involved</em>?</p><p></p><p>Let alone Cheney.</p><p></p><p>But now bush has used the "define sex" strategy of adding <em>anyone convicted</em> to his earlier holier than thou statement.</p><p></p><p>And of course any questioning of the integrity of those in the White House administration has to be <em>politically</em> motivated.</p><p></p><p>I am surprised charges of <em>unpatriotic </em>haven't been leveled at anyone questioning the integrity of anyone in the administration.</p><p></p><p>It is also a see through excuse that the administration says they cannot apologize or comment on Libby because of the ongoing legal case.</p><p></p><p>Then why did they make statements about what a hard working patriot he has been over his career, etc. if they <em>cannot make comments regarding the issue</em>?</p><p></p><p>That seems like a comment to me.</p><p></p><p>Apparently, the only comments they can make are praise for indicted administration personal. <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/tongue.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>Anyone notice as we go over 2000 dead US servicemen and women and untold additional wounded ones (let alone civilians) that every month we are cautioned that we can expect an escalation until the next <u><em>fill in the blank here</em></u> and this talk has been continually recycled with another fill in the blank for almost two plus years?!?</p><p></p><p>With no end in sight.</p><p></p><p>Heck, just this year alone there has been at least four fill in the blank deadlines that have come and passed and the deaths just continue.</p><p></p><p>I see another seven soldiers died just today.</p><p></p><p>Now that the far right has put bush in his place for daring to nominate someone he admired I am sure he will meekly give them the type of judge to change the decisions of the past thirty, forty years that they demand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ok2bclever, post: 71805, member: 1356"] I know there is a huge bush fan club here so this will probably not be well received, but remember this administration ran a campaign about bringing ethics and trust back to the White House? Things like how bush said he'd can anyone involved in the leak. We know Libby was involved, anyone truly believe Rove who's fingers and suggestions are in anything and everything involving this administration [I]wasn't in the knowledge[/I] [I][U]and [/U]involved[/I]? Let alone Cheney. But now bush has used the "define sex" strategy of adding [I]anyone convicted[/I] to his earlier holier than thou statement. And of course any questioning of the integrity of those in the White House administration has to be [I]politically[/I] motivated. I am surprised charges of [I]unpatriotic [/I]haven't been leveled at anyone questioning the integrity of anyone in the administration. It is also a see through excuse that the administration says they cannot apologize or comment on Libby because of the ongoing legal case. Then why did they make statements about what a hard working patriot he has been over his career, etc. if they [I]cannot make comments regarding the issue[/I]? That seems like a comment to me. Apparently, the only comments they can make are praise for indicted administration personal. :p Anyone notice as we go over 2000 dead US servicemen and women and untold additional wounded ones (let alone civilians) that every month we are cautioned that we can expect an escalation until the next [U][I]fill in the blank here[/I][/U] and this talk has been continually recycled with another fill in the blank for almost two plus years?!? With no end in sight. Heck, just this year alone there has been at least four fill in the blank deadlines that have come and passed and the deaths just continue. I see another seven soldiers died just today. Now that the far right has put bush in his place for daring to nominate someone he admired I am sure he will meekly give them the type of judge to change the decisions of the past thirty, forty years that they demand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ethics
Top