Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ethics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ok2bclever" data-source="post: 71982" data-attributes="member: 1356"><p><span style="color: Blue">"But they were guesses, not facts and the administration constantly presented them as facts.</span></p><p><span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p> <span style="color: Blue">Many democratic politicians supported the invasion on these "facts" presented to them.</span></p><p><span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p> <span style="color: Blue">I supported the invasion on these "facts".</span></p><p><span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p> <span style="color: Blue">We trusted this president <u><em>and he lied to us</em></u>."</span> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Many of us supported the invasion under false pretenses.</p><p></p><p>While there was faulty intelligence on this issue there was also valid intelligence on this issue either disputing or at least putting in doubt much of the intelligence that was faulty.</p><p></p><p>The administration purposefully ignored what did not support the intended neorepublican democracy by invasion plan.</p><p></p><p>You didn't understand that part?</p><p></p><p>That isn't to say there are not democrat hawks by any means or that hawks are even necessarily bad.</p><p></p><p>It's just I don't know if there is a definative term for them like <em>neorepublican</em>.</p><p></p><p>On another note, try going to Google or any other major search engine and put in <span style="color: Red">MISERABLE FAILURE</span>.</p><p></p><p>You don't have to capitalize it or color it red.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>I had nothing to do with this, </p><p> but it has been my contention for a long time.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/tongue.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ok2bclever, post: 71982, member: 1356"] [COLOR=Blue]"But they were guesses, not facts and the administration constantly presented them as facts. Many democratic politicians supported the invasion on these "facts" presented to them. I supported the invasion on these "facts". We trusted this president [U][I]and he lied to us[/I][/U]."[/COLOR] Many of us supported the invasion under false pretenses. While there was faulty intelligence on this issue there was also valid intelligence on this issue either disputing or at least putting in doubt much of the intelligence that was faulty. The administration purposefully ignored what did not support the intended neorepublican democracy by invasion plan. You didn't understand that part? That isn't to say there are not democrat hawks by any means or that hawks are even necessarily bad. It's just I don't know if there is a definative term for them like [I]neorepublican[/I]. On another note, try going to Google or any other major search engine and put in [COLOR=Red]MISERABLE FAILURE[/COLOR]. You don't have to capitalize it or color it red.:D I had nothing to do with this, but it has been my contention for a long time.:p [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ethics
Top