Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ethics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 72318" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p>"I agree Wily, the leaker should be punished."</p><p></p><p>This issue has absolutely nothing to do with someone committing a crime that needs to be brought to justice. In fact there is a good chance that her covert CIA role was overstated. </p><p></p><p>This issue is pure politics. The democrats believe its the smoking gun. Their belief that this issue if pursued could end up proving the bush administration knew there were no WMD's and unnecessarily drew us into Iraq. </p><p></p><p>I believed Clinton should have paid the price for what amounts to sexual harrassment in the workplace. </p><p></p><p>If the evidence proves that Bush and Cheney knowingly entered Iraq under false pretenses then I would have no problem holding him accountable for his actions. I will never support the use of our troops for contrived reasons.</p><p></p><p>The two year grand jury with perjury charges that may possibly be generated off faulty recolections of past events does not meet the test. If you were to ask me my recolections of conversations that took place over two years ago there is a good chance I would get at least some of the information wrong.</p><p></p><p>For now I'm willing to let the investigation continue unabated ( not that I can stop it) to answer the question of whether our troops were put into harms way for contrived reasons. But everything I see at this point tells me that the connection between a leaker and a Bush / Cheney WMD consipiracy tells me its a heck of a stretch.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 72318, member: 1912"] "I agree Wily, the leaker should be punished." This issue has absolutely nothing to do with someone committing a crime that needs to be brought to justice. In fact there is a good chance that her covert CIA role was overstated. This issue is pure politics. The democrats believe its the smoking gun. Their belief that this issue if pursued could end up proving the bush administration knew there were no WMD's and unnecessarily drew us into Iraq. I believed Clinton should have paid the price for what amounts to sexual harrassment in the workplace. If the evidence proves that Bush and Cheney knowingly entered Iraq under false pretenses then I would have no problem holding him accountable for his actions. I will never support the use of our troops for contrived reasons. The two year grand jury with perjury charges that may possibly be generated off faulty recolections of past events does not meet the test. If you were to ask me my recolections of conversations that took place over two years ago there is a good chance I would get at least some of the information wrong. For now I'm willing to let the investigation continue unabated ( not that I can stop it) to answer the question of whether our troops were put into harms way for contrived reasons. But everything I see at this point tells me that the connection between a leaker and a Bush / Cheney WMD consipiracy tells me its a heck of a stretch. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ethics
Top