Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Face Book's Hate Agents List
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrownArmy" data-source="post: 4071904" data-attributes="member: 18225"><p>Did you feel that way when they banned Louis Farrakhan?</p><p></p><p>Honestly, Facefk is just catching up to their previous TOS. They were making so much money, they looked the other way.</p><p></p><p>Now, with the heat turned up, they’re simply following through on their initial agreement with their users.</p><p></p><p>Think about it this way: instead of Facefk, let’s look at YouTube.</p><p></p><p>In the wild-west of early YouTube, I could simply upload CD quality rips of copyright-protected major-label bands, and there simply wasn’t a sheriff around to stop me.</p><p></p><p>Try and find Led Zeppelin’s albums on YouTube...you won’t, because the LZ estate retains lawyers who went to the mat over copyright infringement.</p><p></p><p>I don’t have any rights on YouTube, save what they give me.</p><p></p><p>If I post LZII on YouTube right now, my guess is it would last thirty minutes at best.</p><p></p><p>The platform is free, and I can post whatever I want as long as it doesn’t conflict with the TOS (part of which says what you post must be your work, free of anyone else’s copyright).</p><p></p><p>It’s not a perfect analogy, but at the end of the day, Facefk users still play by Facefk’s rules.</p><p></p><p>If Facefk changes the rules, who are you to complain?</p><p></p><p>You’re using their service for free (not really, you’re the product).</p><p></p><p>You don’t have a right to have a Facefk account, and Facefk has no accountability to you, or the government, or etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrownArmy, post: 4071904, member: 18225"] Did you feel that way when they banned Louis Farrakhan? Honestly, Facefk is just catching up to their previous TOS. They were making so much money, they looked the other way. Now, with the heat turned up, they’re simply following through on their initial agreement with their users. Think about it this way: instead of Facefk, let’s look at YouTube. In the wild-west of early YouTube, I could simply upload CD quality rips of copyright-protected major-label bands, and there simply wasn’t a sheriff around to stop me. Try and find Led Zeppelin’s albums on YouTube...you won’t, because the LZ estate retains lawyers who went to the mat over copyright infringement. I don’t have any rights on YouTube, save what they give me. If I post LZII on YouTube right now, my guess is it would last thirty minutes at best. The platform is free, and I can post whatever I want as long as it doesn’t conflict with the TOS (part of which says what you post must be your work, free of anyone else’s copyright). It’s not a perfect analogy, but at the end of the day, Facefk users still play by Facefk’s rules. If Facefk changes the rules, who are you to complain? You’re using their service for free (not really, you’re the product). You don’t have a right to have a Facefk account, and Facefk has no accountability to you, or the government, or etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Face Book's Hate Agents List
Top