Changing their terms of service isn't in and of itself illegal. Defaming the character of people using, or attempting to use, their site is.
Did you feel that way when they banned Louis Farrakhan?
Honestly, Facefk is just catching up to their previous TOS. They were making so much money, they looked the other way.
Now, with the heat turned up, they’re simply following through on their initial agreement with their users.
Think about it this way: instead of Facefk, let’s look at YouTube.
In the wild-west of early YouTube, I could simply upload CD quality rips of copyright-protected major-label bands, and there simply wasn’t a sheriff around to stop me.
Try and find Led Zeppelin’s albums on YouTube...you won’t, because the LZ estate retains lawyers who went to the mat over copyright infringement.
I don’t have any rights on YouTube, save what they give me.
If I post LZII on YouTube right now, my guess is it would last thirty minutes at best.
The platform is free, and I can post whatever I want as long as it doesn’t conflict with the TOS (part of which says what you post must be your work, free of anyone else’s copyright).
It’s not a perfect analogy, but at the end of the day, Facefk users still play by Facefk’s rules.
If Facefk changes the rules, who are you to complain?
You’re using their service for free (not really, you’re the product).
You don’t have a right to have a Facefk account, and Facefk has no accountability to you, or the government, or etc.