Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 2684837" data-attributes="member: 58700">we can go back and forth about whats fake and what is not. But at some point the question has to be asked who holds the media accountable when they intentionally or otherwise get it wrong.the conversation priebus had with the FBI where the New York times article was labeled bull<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2    :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> by the fBI number 2 is a classic example.instead of the press investigating the misrepresentation and therefore abuse of their first amendment application they try to get the trump administration on improper contact.when they do so they clearly state that they want that erroneous story to stay erroneous rather then having it corrected.</blockquote>