Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Fired for job abandonment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 3233790" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>I never said this is how I would approach management in the matter. The possibility that he did nothing wrong was conditional on the successful argument of past practices. The ADA issue was an observation, but I wouldn't dismiss it as an argument if push comes to shove. I never said job abandonment wasn't a terminable offense, I said what he did didn't meet the definition of job abandonment, and I still stand by that. In the summaries I saw a mention of the fact that job abandonment has to be proven, and that requires intent. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Only the imaginary version of me that exists in your mind.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's that intent thing, where have I heard that before?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This sounds awfully similar to something I've seen before too. As he has done in the past? So pointing out the way things have been done in the past could actually help? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wierd how you try your hardest to discredit my arguments, then you straight up admit that you would also use some of them to get the person back to work. This entire time I've been discussing the arguments and reasons for them, haven't even touched on the strategies for employing them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 3233790, member: 63706"] I never said this is how I would approach management in the matter. The possibility that he did nothing wrong was conditional on the successful argument of past practices. The ADA issue was an observation, but I wouldn't dismiss it as an argument if push comes to shove. I never said job abandonment wasn't a terminable offense, I said what he did didn't meet the definition of job abandonment, and I still stand by that. In the summaries I saw a mention of the fact that job abandonment has to be proven, and that requires intent. Only the imaginary version of me that exists in your mind. There's that intent thing, where have I heard that before? This sounds awfully similar to something I've seen before too. As he has done in the past? So pointing out the way things have been done in the past could actually help? Wierd how you try your hardest to discredit my arguments, then you straight up admit that you would also use some of them to get the person back to work. This entire time I've been discussing the arguments and reasons for them, haven't even touched on the strategies for employing them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Fired for job abandonment
Top