dilligaf
IN VINO VERITAS
I have to pay the doctors office everytime they fill out forms.there is nothing in the contract stating you have to call anyone. Just inform/notify. Definitely, nothing about paying $25 over and over again!
I have to pay the doctors office everytime they fill out forms.there is nothing in the contract stating you have to call anyone. Just inform/notify. Definitely, nothing about paying $25 over and over again!
They have created a new contractual requirement without any negotiations with the union.I'm not done yet, not by a long shot.....................................
I understand that. My point is the contract states nothing about this, therefore can be viewed as violating the spirit of the contract.I have to pay the doctors office everytime they fill out forms.
The company is right in this situation.
I understand that. My point is the contract states nothing about this, therefore can be viewed as violating the spirit of the contract.
Wouldn't the forms you filled already still be good? Do they have an expiration date? I'd use the same damn forms. UPS can pay for any additional ones they think they need.
I found out some new info. 1 - It's not a 24 hr prior to. It's call when you know. Ok, so that is good but the rest IS NOT. Failure to call the automated system constitutes a no call/no show and is grounds for termination. It makes no difference if I have notified my supervisor, I HAVE to call the automated system. So I asked sup, "So then I don't have to call you anymore?". Nope. I have to call him and call the automated.
If that system s up and doesn't show that I called in then I am in jeopardy of losing my job over a no call/no show. That's wrong.
I called the number tonight to do whatever steps I needed to do. This is priceless ----- "I'm sorry but we are closed. Please call back between 8am and 9pm, Monday thru Fri." I called at around 7:30. This is NOT instilling a lot of confidence on my part.
And that is one that might work. I saw that last night while looking through my contract.They have created a new contractual requirement without any negotiations with the union.
I dont have the forms, they were sent to PHX. NO, I didn't make a copy of them, didn't think I would need to.I understand that. My point is the contract states nothing about this, therefore can be viewed as violating the spirit of the contract.
Wouldn't the forms you filled already still be good? Do they have an expiration date? I'd use the same damn forms. UPS can pay for any additional ones they think they need.
FMLA is 36I have to disagree with you on this one. I know personally that as long as the absence is coded (and forgive me if I have the wrong code number. I believe it is 35) as a FMLA day then the holiday pay is due. If it was coded as a call in absence then it would be unpaid.
It all depends on which code the absence is logged as. The employee above is due his holiday pay.
The company is right in this situation.
Funny. I've gotten people paid for this at my center.The company is right in this situation.
The ironic thing is that I am in the same center and was paid for the exact same holiday, when I took off the exact same day before the same holiday for an FMLA. I submitted a letter in support of the other employee's grievance requesting to be paid for the holiday when an approved FMLA day was used before the holiday. The company is inconsistent in its FMLA policy. It is certainly a mutually agreed upon absence when the employee has a letter from UPS approving the FMLA leave. In fact, if you have any vacation days left, the company is allowed to take one vacation day and pay you for one vacation day for each FMLA day used. Could UPS honestly claim that it was not a mutually agreed upon absence if they paid you for a vacation day??Funny. I've gotten people paid for this at my center.