Food stamp cuts in Ohio, soon in your state

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by toonertoo, Nov 13, 2012.

  1. toonertoo

    toonertoo Most Awesome Dog Staff Member

    Ohio Food Stamp Recipients Will See $50 Cut in 2013 |
    So there ya go. You voted for a president who cared about the poor. The only people who will be hurt is the truly needy. The abusers will just have 50 less to trade however.
    Notice no due diligence done, just a straight across the board cut. The elderly couple getting 180, will now get 130. The woman with 6 kids will get hers cut from 1000 to 950. Who gets hurt? The responsible trying to survive.
  2. klein

    klein Für Meno :)

    Does anyone care, esspecially you that has hundreds of times complained about the welfare state ?

    The elderly couple that didn't work enough in life - well their fault.
    The woman that decides to have 6 kids not being able to afford them - well who's fault is that ?
  3. island1fox

    island1fox Well-Known Member


    In your world there is NO PERSONAL RESPONSABILITY ??????




    YES,YES YES . It is her FAULT !!!:sick:
  4. Jones

    Jones fILE A GRIEVE! Staff Member

    I'm pretty sure you're agreeing with him.
  5. Monkey Butt

    Monkey Butt Dark Prince of Double Standards Staff Member

    Gawd! That's even worse!
  6. toonertoo

    toonertoo Most Awesome Dog Staff Member

    The elderly have no recourse, and Klein, you need to sthu. You interject when you have no clue. I have only complained about the abuse. I have never ever, said there are not some people who need help, and I am all for that. So before you stuff your own foot in your own hot dog mouth, know who you are condemning.
    The elderly have no way to go out and earn money again, as the disabled cannot. I have said numerous times, that those who had a choice, and made bad ones hurt those who need help. The woman with more kids than she could afford could have walked in a family planning clinic since the late 60s and got birth control for nothing. It has never been a problem, never should be one, and surely is not one now! If you cannot find your way to a family planning center, maybe you should spend time doing that instead of having sex. I do not think abortion should be birth control, but it is readily available also, and if for some reason the congress decides to make it illegal, it is a state by state decision, not the fed govts. As long as you can travel, you can safely and legally abort your child.
  7. Baba gounj

    Baba gounj pensioner

    Klein , please pm your home address , I'll pass it along to the woman with 6 kids , she'll be overjoyed that you'll help support her.
  8. bluehdmc

    bluehdmc Well-Known Member

    Of course everyone was up in arms because they didn't want Obamacare to fund birth control because it violated peoples freedom of religion.
  9. toonertoo

    toonertoo Most Awesome Dog Staff Member

    Our UPS wonderful insurance did not cover birth control when I was of age, guess what, bc pills are like 18 bucks a month, condoms less. I never had a problem with it. Whats the big deal? If you are ready to procreate like rabbits, take a pill, wear a condom. its not an issue that should be dividing the country, or an issue to run on. It really is no big deal, why all of a sudden is it? Dont want people in your bedrooms? Dont expect people to pay for bedroom activity. Personal responsibility. They want to condemn and tax people who smoke too much, drink too much, or use recreational drugs.......or eat at mickey ds. Omg, obesity, high blood pressure, drug addiction, well one of those gets you a free card, why? Doing drugs. being an addict is a choice. All things we all have control over, so if you engage in these, you pay a premium. How about people who have too much sex, so much they cant provide birth control. Give it a rest, its wrong, it is an elective. Keep freedom of religion out of it. Number one is the govt has no business in it!
  10. satellitedriver

    satellitedriver Moderator Staff Member

    You have been the poster boy example of how a non productive citizen can live "on the dole" in a socialist society.
    Once your personal funds got low, you decided to stick your wiener out.
    Both your comments, and product, come up very short.
  11. klein

    klein Für Meno :)

    I haved never lived off government funds except for unemployment insurance, which I do not consider welfare money !
    So, I am not that woman with 6 kids, neither the elderly broke couple, since I have good pension monies comming towards me in just over a decade.
  12. Monkey Butt

    Monkey Butt Dark Prince of Double Standards Staff Member

    Klein's commenting on USA society and government reminds me of men talking about and offering advice on abortions.
  13. Monkey Butt

    Monkey Butt Dark Prince of Double Standards Staff Member

    I have never met anyone who thought their "living off government funds", including that woman with the 6 kids, as welfare.
    Most people consider unemployment insurance a form of government redistribution of wages.
  14. satellitedriver

    satellitedriver Moderator Staff Member

    Gotta love your qualifier in the sentence.
    "except for"
    Dude, you never paid the full premiums into the "insurance" fund, but took the benefits of your 2nd adoptive country that you hold a passport with and you have bragged that you could hold a 3rd passport in another country.
    True citizenry, of a nation, is determined by effort of the citizen, to improve and support the nation.
    Users are Losers.
    Yes, in the next decade you will piss off what little you have on grand schemes and have $4,000 a month coming in "pension".
    10yrs from now $4,000 a month will be welfare money.

  15. island1fox

    island1fox Well-Known Member


    DO not know if you have children or not----but let's say the woman who CHOSE to date,engage,Marry,have sex with you----under present U.S. law----no matter what your beliefs or feelings about your unborn child---Your wife ---without even discussing it with can stop its heartbeat. Of course men should never talk about Abortion ???:sad-little:
  16. menotyou

    menotyou bella amicizia

    Great. More moochers moving to NY.
  17. Monkey Butt

    Monkey Butt Dark Prince of Double Standards Staff Member

    Perhaps you missed my point which is that Klein has just as much right to talk about USA society and government form as a man does to talk about abortion.

    I think your response is that klein has as much right to talk about USA as you and I do.
  18. UpstateNYUPSer

    UpstateNYUPSer Very proud grandfather.

    Why then must married men under the age of 35 considering a vasectomy have the "approval" of their spouse before the procedure can be performed?
  19. bbsam

    bbsam Moderator Staff Member

    From what I have seen, most men who have gotten themselves into that situation are fine with the woman making that choice. Wheter it is youthful nonprecaution or marital infidelity, alot of men would push for the abortion. In such cases where the two are unmarried and the man is in favor of the birth and the woman not, quite frankly I question the man's motive. His choice to have sex with the woman in the legal world we live in has consequences for him and he put himself in that position.
  20. Jones

    Jones fILE A GRIEVE! Staff Member

    Men should give their advice if (and only if) they get asked for it.