Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 1445449" data-attributes="member: 14176">It&#039;s not about you.It&#039;s about the collective whole who have had a choice that was bargained for, until now.For many it is the only days of the year that the whole family can come together from their various corners of the country.Some things are vastly more important than money and what it can or cannot buy.The language hasn&#039;t changed in Art 15 sec 1 of the Central Region and it states &quot;no seniority employee shall be required to work on the below named holidays&quot;.Aside from Art 40 in the Master, there is nothing in any agreement that supersedes this.Several contend that section 4 of Art 15 does and I have asked repeatedly, that if this is the case and we can be forced to work any holiday aside from an air operation, when is the quoted language in Art15 sec 1 relevant?Why would it say in section 1 &quot;shall not be required to work&quot; and then state we can be required in section 4?Nobody can answer this question.Section 4 provides for the pay rate for the only scenario contractually viable, an Art 40 air operation, not a full day.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 1445449, member: 14176"] It's not about you. It's about the collective whole who have had a choice that was bargained for, until now. For many it is the only days of the year that the whole family can come together from their various corners of the country. Some things are vastly more important than money and what it can or cannot buy. The language hasn't changed in Art 15 sec 1 of the Central Region and it states "no seniority employee shall be required to work on the below named holidays". Aside from Art 40 in the Master, there is nothing in any agreement that supersedes this. Several contend that section 4 of Art 15 does and I have asked repeatedly, that if this is the case and we can be forced to work any holiday aside from an air operation, when is the quoted language in Art15 sec 1 relevant? Why would it say in section 1 "shall not be required to work" and then state we can be required in section 4? Nobody can answer this question. Section 4 provides for the pay rate for the only scenario contractually viable, an Art 40 air operation, not a full day. [/QUOTE]

Verification