Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
From The Chairman: Transition to Ground
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="59 Dano" data-source="post: 4403192" data-attributes="member: 23516"><p>They weren't granted an exemption. Don't know why it's so hard for you to understand this. They were already recognized as being covered by the RLA by the NMB and the court system. The express carrier wording was part of the RLA until 1995 or so, when the Interstate Commerce Commission suggested that the term was obsolete and lacked any meaning it was removed from several other pieces of legislation. For the purposes of the ICC, it was obsolete. However, for the NMB it still retained meaning as helping to determine if a company should be covered by the RLA or NLRA.</p><p></p><p>TL;DR: The wording of the act was restored to what the wording of the act was supposed to be and had been.</p><p></p><p>Seriously, why do I have to keep telling you what happened if you think you're the expert? Why is all of this so foreign to you? You keep playing these games instead of debating whether Express should be covered by the RLA as per the criteria that the government uses for this. </p><p></p><p>It's no surprise why you keep ducking and avoiding that particular discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="59 Dano, post: 4403192, member: 23516"] They weren't granted an exemption. Don't know why it's so hard for you to understand this. They were already recognized as being covered by the RLA by the NMB and the court system. The express carrier wording was part of the RLA until 1995 or so, when the Interstate Commerce Commission suggested that the term was obsolete and lacked any meaning it was removed from several other pieces of legislation. For the purposes of the ICC, it was obsolete. However, for the NMB it still retained meaning as helping to determine if a company should be covered by the RLA or NLRA. TL;DR: The wording of the act was restored to what the wording of the act was supposed to be and had been. Seriously, why do I have to keep telling you what happened if you think you're the expert? Why is all of this so foreign to you? You keep playing these games instead of debating whether Express should be covered by the RLA as per the criteria that the government uses for this. It's no surprise why you keep ducking and avoiding that particular discussion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
From The Chairman: Transition to Ground
Top