Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Global warming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 1277855" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>Ok the wager was that I did not link to peer reviewed papers with a penalty of banning.</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>Carbon dioxide forcing alone insufficient to explain Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum warming </strong></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">You admitted this was a peer reviewed paper published in a journal. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Amplifying the Pacific Climate System Response to a Small 11-Year Solar Cycle Forcing</strong></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px">This was another peer review paper that I linked to for you. These are the particulars for this paper.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px">Science 28 August 2009: </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px">Vol. 325 no. 5944 pp. 1114-1118 </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px">DOI: 10.1126/science.1172872</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Received for publication 27 February 2009.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Accepted for publication 17 July 2009.</li> </ul><p><span style="font-size: 18px">This is probably my favorite of the three. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>The stadium wave</strong></span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">I only linked to the authors site instead of the peer reviewed publication on the off chance that you had wanted to read it so you wouldn't have to pay for it. </span></strong><span style="font-size: 22px">From one of the top scientists in the field.</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: #ff0000">In any world that qualifies as "papers" from "peer reviewed" publications. Honor your word and get banned.</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: #000000">Thank you </span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: #000000"></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: #000000">Have a great life.....</span></span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 1277855, member: 8259"] Ok the wager was that I did not link to peer reviewed papers with a penalty of banning. [SIZE=5][B]Carbon dioxide forcing alone insufficient to explain Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum warming [/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=4]You admitted this was a peer reviewed paper published in a journal. [/SIZE] [SIZE=5][SIZE=6][B]Amplifying the Pacific Climate System Response to a Small 11-Year Solar Cycle Forcing[/B][/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=5] This was another peer review paper that I linked to for you. These are the particulars for this paper. Science 28 August 2009: Vol. 325 no. 5944 pp. 1114-1118 DOI: 10.1126/science.1172872 [/SIZE] [LIST] [*]Received for publication 27 February 2009. [*]Accepted for publication 17 July 2009. [/LIST] [SIZE=5]This is probably my favorite of the three. [SIZE=6][B]The stadium wave[/B][/SIZE][/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]I only linked to the authors site instead of the peer reviewed publication on the off chance that you had wanted to read it so you wouldn't have to pay for it. [/SIZE][/B][SIZE=6]From one of the top scientists in the field.[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=5][COLOR=#ff0000]In any world that qualifies as "papers" from "peer reviewed" publications. Honor your word and get banned. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000]Thank you Have a great life.....[/COLOR][/SIZE][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Global warming
Top
