Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="roadrunner2012" data-source="post: 1290205" data-attributes="member: 40736">Meanwhile, last year on planet Earth, you mean. You linked to an actual tabloid piece, by the way. Thta is not suprising,, since most everyone agrees that there is solid evidence of human caused warming.You did read the actual, peer reviewed study I linked to, right?<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/enhanced/doi/10.1002/wcc.277" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/enhanced/doi/10.1002/wcc.277</a>BTW, your posts that claim 50% increase are year to year, not historical. From your link:Despite the short-term rebound, sea ice volumes remain low compared to historical averages, scientists say.In September, the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Centre reported that Arctic ice cover at its summer minimum this year was 5.1 million square kilometres. That was also up 50 per cent from last year’s record low, but the sixth lowest on record. The seven lowest levels have all been recorded in the last seven years.Reading the articles past the headline must not be your thing. See the linked video in post 851. You continue to embarrass yourself. Find another thread and criticize my spelling, because this is a lost cause for you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="roadrunner2012, post: 1290205, member: 40736"] Meanwhile, last year on planet Earth, you mean. You linked to an actual tabloid piece, by the way. Thta is not suprising,, since most everyone agrees that there is solid evidence of human caused warming. You did read the actual, peer reviewed study I linked to, right? [url]http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/enhanced/doi/10.1002/wcc.277[/url] BTW, your posts that claim 50% increase are year to year, not historical. From your link: [I]Despite the short-term rebound, sea ice volumes remain low compared to historical averages, [B]scientists[/B] say.[/I] [I]In September, the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Centre reported that Arctic ice cover at its summer minimum this year was 5.1 million square kilometres. That was also up 50 per cent from last year’s record low, but the [B]sixth lowest on record.[/B] The seven lowest levels have all been recorded in the last seven years.[/I] Reading the articles past the headline must not be your thing. See the linked video in post 851. You continue to embarrass yourself. Find another thread and criticize my spelling, because this is a lost cause for you. [/QUOTE]

Verification