Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="oldngray" data-source="post: 1304311" data-attributes="member: 45230">Occam’s Razor - Given the great natural variability exhibited by climate records, and the failure to date to compartmentalize or identify a human signal within them, the proper null hypothesis – because it is the simplest consistent with the known facts – is that global climate changes are presumed to be natural, unless and until specific evidence is forthcoming for human causation.It is one of the more extraordinary facts about the IPCC that the research studies it favours mostly proceed using an (unjustified) inversion of the null hypothesis&nbsp; – namely that global climate changes are presumed to be due to human-related carbon dioxide emissions, unless and until specific evidence indicates otherwise.<a href="http://www.aitse.org/global-warming-anthropogenic-or-not/" target="_blank">http://www.aitse.org/global-warming-anthropogenic-or-not/</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="oldngray, post: 1304311, member: 45230"] Occam’s Razor - Given the great natural variability exhibited by climate records, and the failure to date to compartmentalize or identify a human signal within them, the proper null hypothesis – because it is the simplest consistent with the known facts – is that [I]global climate changes are presumed to be natural, unless and until specific evidence is forthcoming for human causation[/I]. It is one of the more extraordinary facts about the IPCC that the research studies it favours mostly proceed using an (unjustified) inversion of the null hypothesis – namely that [I]global climate changes are presumed to be due to human-related carbon dioxide emissions, unless and until specific evidence indicates otherwise[/I]. [url]http://www.aitse.org/global-warming-anthropogenic-or-not/[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification