Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Global warming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="oldngray" data-source="post: 1307406" data-attributes="member: 45230"><p><a href="http://www.masterresource.org/2013/11/avian-mortality-negin-vs-wiegand/" target="_blank">http://www.masterresource.org/2013/11/avian-mortality-negin-vs-wiegand/</a></p><p>The wind industry is set up to hide their horrific mortality problem. Some East Coast studies I have looked have concealed tens of thousand of fatalities. I recently looked over a 7 month study that I believe concealed over 25,000 bat fatalities and over 5000 bird fatalities. This was the estimated mortality from just 28- 2.5 MW turbines after making adjustments for their tiny search areas and other factors.</p><p></p><p>These two scientists argue back and forth and mostly about who is funding them, which is valid since both sides have bias, but it does show those death rates claimed are disputed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="oldngray, post: 1307406, member: 45230"] [url]http://www.masterresource.org/2013/11/avian-mortality-negin-vs-wiegand/[/url] The wind industry is set up to hide their horrific mortality problem. Some East Coast studies I have looked have concealed tens of thousand of fatalities. I recently looked over a 7 month study that I believe concealed over 25,000 bat fatalities and over 5000 bird fatalities. This was the estimated mortality from just 28- 2.5 MW turbines after making adjustments for their tiny search areas and other factors. These two scientists argue back and forth and mostly about who is funding them, which is valid since both sides have bias, but it does show those death rates claimed are disputed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Global warming
Top