Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 1547737" data-attributes="member: 198">The 97% of the people surveyed in that article THINK that man made global warming is real. Just because they are scientists doesn't mean their OPINION makes it true. True science is proving something. There is, to date, no proof that there is man made global warming. There really isn't any proof that there is any kind of global warming. Those that claim there are usually look back to a certain year (usually the coldest on record) and work from there so of course their research will show increases. And your arctic ice melt is an incomplete model. If you really dive into global warming research you will find that for every claim of ice melting, rivers drying up, etc. ect. there is an opposite event somewhere else on the planet. Scientists are to be respected for their SCIENTIFICALLY proven (meaning following "Scientific Method") findings but your survey is nothing more than an example of 97% of those surveyed saying that they THINK man is causing the Earth to warm more than nature does. But nice try though.Currently the only way to gauge weather patterns is to look at weather records we've kept so far. Our records only account for a tiny (for lack of a better word) fraction of this planet's history. Man is incapable of accurately measuring current weather patterns against past patterns to determine any extent of damage man could be causing IF man made global warming was real. It's like looking at temperature increases from June to August and claiming the temperature will reach 200 degrees by December. The sun is the true cause of any weather fluctuations. The sun itself goes through warming and cooling periods. The Earth's weather patterns were drastically shifting back and forth for millions of years before man ever existed. Other planets in our solar system go through the same thing and no human being has set foot on any of them. Let alone lived there long enough to damage the climates.These are things that many of those scientists purposely don't consider. Why? Because many of them rely on a flow of cash to fund their research and to deny man made global warming could cut their funding. Some are just using junk science. Either way there hasn't been, nor will there ever be, any proof that man is causing climate change. At least not on the scale that global warming alarmists claim.</blockquote>

Verification