Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 1076325" data-attributes="member: 22662"><p>Not really.  You've set up the same "either or" scenario.  It doesn't have to be that way.  You could easily have both real push for revamping mental health policies and increased "gun free zones".  But I agree, such zones do little.  So what?  So they get a "feel good"?  So what?  Why intensify that fight if the real solution lies in mental health?  In fact, I don't hear any of the "liberals" that you insist are your foe in this discussion being anti-mental health reform.  So explain to me why the insistance that one thing has to come before another?  Perhaps it is inconvenient for some gun owners.  I doubt that it's unconstitutional but if it is the courts can fix that.</p></blockquote><p></p>