Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 1116903" data-attributes="member: 14668">Her statement is, sadly, based on emotion rather than fact.The most dangerous part of an assault weapon...or any weapon for that matter....is the lunatic behind the trigger who has been granted a monopoly of force by the cowardly and idiotic politicians and school administrators who cling to the fantasy that the best way to protect our children is to herd them into clearly marked and designated &quot;gun free zones&quot; where they can be slaughtered without the risk of armed interference.It didnt keep them safe at Thurston, it didnt keep them safe at Columbine, it didnt keep them safe at Virginia Tech, it didnt keep them safe at the theater in Colorado and it didnt keep them safe at Sandy Hook.How many more must die before the bitter truth about &quot;gun free zones&quot; finally sinks in?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="soberups, post: 1116903, member: 14668"] Her statement is, sadly, based on [I]emotion[/I] rather than [I]fact. [/I]The most[I] dangerous[/I] part of an assault weapon...or [I]any[/I] weapon for that matter....[U]is the lunatic behind the trigger [/U]who has been granted a [I]monopoly of force[/I] by the cowardly and idiotic politicians and school administrators who cling to the fantasy that the best way to protect our children is to herd them into clearly marked and designated "gun free zones" where they can be slaughtered without the risk of armed interference. It didnt keep them safe at Thurston, it didnt keep them safe at Columbine, it didnt keep them safe at Virginia Tech, it didnt keep them safe at the theater in Colorado and it didnt keep them safe at Sandy Hook. How many more must die before the bitter truth about "gun free zones" finally sinks in? [/QUOTE]

Verification