Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UPS Lifer" data-source="post: 1122485" data-attributes="member: 9789">I love your statement and I LOVE the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia line!!!!&nbsp; Though I agree with your logical conclusion crossing over state lines.&nbsp; I will not go against my principles.&nbsp; I believe in state&#039;s rights and will continue to be an advocate. However I won&#039;t argue with your point except to remind us that even with a driver&#039;s license, each state has certain laws or rules we must abide by to use that license.&nbsp; It is not a &quot;right&quot;, it is a privilege we have to earn. The 2nd Amendment gives us the right to bare arms.&nbsp; Unfortunately, each state as well as the Feds may interpret that differently.&nbsp; It is similar to the Teamster/UPS contract. There are areas that need to be debated and arbitrated because of interpretation.&nbsp; Words can only go so far!!!OH! - I left this out - Where all of this gets real sticky is the motives or hidden agenda behind the interpretation!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UPS Lifer, post: 1122485, member: 9789"] I love your statement and I LOVE the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia line!!!! Though I agree with your logical conclusion crossing over state lines. I will not go against my principles. I believe in state's rights and will continue to be an advocate. However I won't argue with your point except to remind us that even with a driver's license, each state has certain laws or rules we must abide by to use that license. It is not a "right", it is a privilege we have to earn. The 2nd Amendment gives us the [B]right[/B] to bare arms. Unfortunately, each state as well as the Feds may interpret that differently. It is similar to the Teamster/UPS contract. There are areas that need to be debated and arbitrated because of interpretation. Words can only go so far!!! OH! - I left this out - Where all of this gets real sticky is the motives or hidden agenda behind the interpretation! [/QUOTE]

Verification