Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 1124495" data-attributes="member: 14668">They are an even worse problem to the public if they are the only ones in possession of weapons.Philosophically speaking, I dont really have a problem with the idea of background checks. What scares me the most about mandatory checks...are the politicians who are promoting them. Take NYC mayor Bloomberg for example. This is a man who would deny the subjects of his little empire the right to purchase a 32 ounce soft drink. There is no way in hell I want a man like that to have any sort of access to the serial numbers of the guns I buy or sell. I wonder how many of these politicians would still be advocating mandatory background checks if they also came with 50-state reciprocity for Concealed Carry permits. Probably none; they are less interested in background checks than they are with the unilateral disarmament of law-abiding Americans citizens.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="soberups, post: 1124495, member: 14668"] They are an even [I]worse[/I] problem to the public if they are the [I]only[/I] ones in possession of weapons. Philosophically speaking, I dont really have a problem with the idea of background checks. What scares me the most about mandatory checks...are the politicians who are promoting them. Take NYC mayor Bloomberg for example. This is a man who would deny the subjects of his little empire the right to purchase a 32 ounce soft drink. There is no way in [I]hell[/I] I want a man like that to have [I]any[/I] sort of access to the serial numbers of the guns I buy or sell. I wonder how many of these politicians would still be advocating mandatory background checks if they also came with 50-state reciprocity for Concealed Carry permits. Probably none; they are less interested in background checks than they are with the unilateral disarmament of law-abiding Americans citizens. [/QUOTE]

Verification