Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 1191666" data-attributes="member: 44954">It&#039;s working out for me the same as it is for you.... or was that remark because you&#039;re assuming I&#039;m a democrat?I&#039;m aware of Terry v Ohio, my problem is the assumption of reasonable suspicion. &#039;This reasonable suspicion must be based on &quot;specific and articulable facts&quot; and not merely upon an officer&#039;s hunch.&#039;The district judge has ruled Stop an Frisk illegal because of the minority issues.&nbsp; I think she did that simply because it was the easiest way to rule stop and frisk illegal.&nbsp; Bloomberg is gonna appeal, and I hope it goes to the supreme court so we can get some clarity on wtf reasonable suspicion is specifically.&nbsp; Personally, I don&#039;t think the color blue or red(or brown for that matter) gives you reasonable anything.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DriveInDriѵeOut, post: 1191666, member: 44954"] It's working out for me the same as it is for you.... or was that remark because you're assuming I'm a democrat? I'm aware of Terry v Ohio, my problem is the assumption of reasonable suspicion. '[COLOR=#000000][FONT=sans-serif]This reasonable suspicion must be based on "specific and articulable facts" and not merely upon an officer's hunch.' [/FONT][/COLOR]The district judge has ruled Stop an Frisk illegal because of the minority issues. I think she did that simply because it was the easiest way to rule stop and frisk illegal. Bloomberg is gonna appeal, and I hope it goes to the supreme court so we can get some clarity on wtf reasonable suspicion is specifically. Personally, I don't think the color blue or red(or brown for that matter) gives you reasonable anything. [/QUOTE]

Verification