Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
guns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 1218006" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>Everybody wants to focus attention on the fact that Adam Lanza had access to lethal weapons when he went on his murderous rampage.</p><p></p><p>I'd rather focus on the fact that <em>none</em> of the law-abiding adults who were present at Sandy Hook that day had access to weapons of <em>their own</em>.</p><p></p><p>I'd rather focus on the fact that Sandy Hook Elementary School was, by law, a conveniently labeled and located <em>unarmed victim zone </em>where any lunatic with a gun would be automatically granted a <em>monopoly</em> on the use of lethal force and was guranteed to find a concentrated pool of helpless victims. We saw this at Thurston High school; we saw it at Columbine; we saw it at Virginia Tech; we saw it at the theater in Aurora Colorado. One deranged lunatic, given BY LAW the power of life and death over victims who were, BY LAW, denied <em>any</em> effective means of defending themselves.</p><p></p><p>If we could somehow go beyond the grave and speak to the dead school principal who bravely threw <em>her unarmed body </em>at Adam Lanza in a futile and hopeless attempt to save her students, my guess is that she would have given <em>anything</em> in those final moments of her life for access to a gun. How different would the narrative be today if this brave principal had been able to retrieve a 12 gauge shotgun from a locker and engaged Lanza on equal terms? How many children might still be alive today? Sadly, we will never know. All we will ever have....is a few more "gun free zone" signs and stickers on the doors.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 1218006, member: 14668"] Everybody wants to focus attention on the fact that Adam Lanza had access to lethal weapons when he went on his murderous rampage. I'd rather focus on the fact that [I]none[/I] of the law-abiding adults who were present at Sandy Hook that day had access to weapons of [I]their own[/I]. I'd rather focus on the fact that Sandy Hook Elementary School was, by law, a conveniently labeled and located [I]unarmed victim zone [/I]where any lunatic with a gun would be automatically granted a [I]monopoly[/I] on the use of lethal force and was guranteed to find a concentrated pool of helpless victims. We saw this at Thurston High school; we saw it at Columbine; we saw it at Virginia Tech; we saw it at the theater in Aurora Colorado. One deranged lunatic, given BY LAW the power of life and death over victims who were, BY LAW, denied [I]any[/I] effective means of defending themselves. If we could somehow go beyond the grave and speak to the dead school principal who bravely threw [I]her unarmed body [/I]at Adam Lanza in a futile and hopeless attempt to save her students, my guess is that she would have given [I]anything[/I] in those final moments of her life for access to a gun. How different would the narrative be today if this brave principal had been able to retrieve a 12 gauge shotgun from a locker and engaged Lanza on equal terms? How many children might still be alive today? Sadly, we will never know. All we will ever have....is a few more "gun free zone" signs and stickers on the doors. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
guns
Top