Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
guns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 1349138" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>Because a lot of people who are ignorant of guns will be ok with a rifle that has a wooden stock and looks "traditional" but if you take the <em>same</em> rifle and drop it into a stock made of black plastic and add a couple of "tactical" cosmetic features to it then it becomes an "assault weapon". It has also become commonplace to refer to all military-styled weapons as "black guns". My Ruger Mini-30 is a perfect example, it is a magazine-fed semi-automatic rifle and in its current configuration (normal wooden stock) it would be legal to own in California as long as it only had a 10 round magazine. The stock is removeable with a couple of bolts and if I dropped it into a black polymer "tactical" stock with a pistol grip....or put a flash suppressor on the end of the barrel...under California law it would automatically go from being legal to being classified as a prohibited "assault weapon" based on cosmetic features alone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 1349138, member: 14668"] Because a lot of people who are ignorant of guns will be ok with a rifle that has a wooden stock and looks "traditional" but if you take the [I]same[/I] rifle and drop it into a stock made of black plastic and add a couple of "tactical" cosmetic features to it then it becomes an "assault weapon". It has also become commonplace to refer to all military-styled weapons as "black guns". My Ruger Mini-30 is a perfect example, it is a magazine-fed semi-automatic rifle and in its current configuration (normal wooden stock) it would be legal to own in California as long as it only had a 10 round magazine. The stock is removeable with a couple of bolts and if I dropped it into a black polymer "tactical" stock with a pistol grip....or put a flash suppressor on the end of the barrel...under California law it would automatically go from being legal to being classified as a prohibited "assault weapon" based on cosmetic features alone. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
guns
Top