Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 1363193" data-attributes="member: 17969">You can have &quot;your&quot; interpretation of the second amendment as i stated before.&nbsp; Its clear you lose this battle.&nbsp; Just because a couple million other idiots believe what you believe, means nothing.&nbsp; Even fox news has 2.6 nightly idiots that believe everything they say.I realize now, that language means nothing to you, and that somehow, you want to distort not only the second amendment, but the treatment of blacks in this country as well.&nbsp; As if they were equal citizens at the time, and women could vote.I get it, your gun is your god.The great equalizer. As to the supreme court, they dont agree with you.&nbsp; Heller v DC didnt mean that you could have assault rifles bro, it only ruled that in the courts opinion (5 to 4) that a private person could own a handgun in the home, but deferred long rifles and assault type weapons back to the states.Try to be a little more honest with guns.&nbsp; You are only fooling yourself.Its clear, you lose this argument.&nbsp; Everytime, from now on, when you use a comma, you will know that I own you.I still believe you are a smart man, with a strong conviction and the ability to use rational thinking, however, at some point, while you still have an opportunity to own guns, you could at least accept that you are wrong, but for the moment have the benefit of states rights versus national rights.Attack me all you want, it matters not.&nbsp; TOS.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 1363193, member: 17969"] You can have "your" interpretation of the second amendment as i stated before. Its clear you lose this battle. Just because a couple million other idiots believe what you believe, means nothing. Even fox news has 2.6 nightly idiots that believe everything they say. I realize now, that language means nothing to you, and that somehow, you want to distort not only the second amendment, but the treatment of blacks in this country as well. As if they were equal citizens at the time, and women could vote. I get it, your gun is your god. The great equalizer. As to the supreme court, they dont agree with you. Heller v DC didnt mean that you could have assault rifles bro, it only ruled that in the courts opinion (5 to 4) that a private person could own a handgun in the home, but deferred long rifles and assault type weapons back to the states. Try to be a little more honest with guns. You are only fooling yourself. Its clear, you lose this argument. Everytime, from now on, when you use a comma, you will know that [U]I own you. [/U] I still believe you are a smart man, with a strong conviction and the ability to use rational thinking, however, at some point, while you still have an opportunity to own guns, you could at least accept that you are wrong, but for the moment have the benefit of states rights versus national rights. Attack me all you want, it matters not. TOS. [/QUOTE]

Verification