Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 2012801" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>You are right about their filters. They know the laws and abide by them every single day and can easily filter out the BS that anti-gun/gun control liberals dish out about guns. People that aren&#039;t even qualified to make decisions pertaining to guns have, and still are, attempting to make purchasing and owning guns more restrictive then ever before. For example......right now we have to jump through hoops and pay a $200 &quot;tax&quot; on a rifle just because it&#039;s barrel is shorter than 16 inches. And that solves what &quot;problem&quot;? And we have to pay the same &quot;tax&quot; and jump through the same hoops to purchase a device simply because it suppresses (not silences) a gun. Again...what &quot;problem&quot; does that solve? We have powerful politicians that are scared to death of a rifle and call it an &quot;assault rifle&quot; because it looks scary when in reality it is no more affective than most of what they consider &quot;normal rifles.&quot; These people are making stupid UNCONSTITUTIONAL decisions based on ignorance and fear. Chad and Eric know more about guns and the laws pertaining to them than most of the people that are anti-gun/gun control types. The one&#039;s that actually know these things are the most shameful because they still push on with their agendas.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Overpaid Union Thug, post: 2012801, member: 198"] You are right about their filters. They know the laws and abide by them every single day and can easily filter out the BS that anti-gun/gun control liberals dish out about guns. People that aren't even qualified to make decisions pertaining to guns have, and still are, attempting to make purchasing and owning guns more restrictive then ever before. For example......right now we have to jump through hoops and pay a $200 "tax" on a rifle just because it's barrel is shorter than 16 inches. And that solves what "problem"? And we have to pay the same "tax" and jump through the same hoops to purchase a device simply because it suppresses (not silences) a gun. Again...what "problem" does that solve? We have powerful politicians that are scared to death of a rifle and call it an "assault rifle" because it looks scary when in reality it is no more affective than most of what they consider "normal rifles." These people are making stupid UNCONSTITUTIONAL decisions based on ignorance and fear. Chad and Eric know more about guns and the laws pertaining to them than most of the people that are anti-gun/gun control types. The one's that actually know these things are the most shameful because they still push on with their agendas. [/QUOTE]

Verification