Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
guns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 954681" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>Even if true, it does not change the fact that Zimmerman <em>instigated</em> the encounter by getting out of his vehicle and pursuing an individual who had not at that point committed <em>any</em> sort of crime.</p><p></p><p>We also do not know if the witness saw the <em>entire</em> encounter from start to finish, or only what happened <em>after</em> Zimmerman and Martin began fighting. It is entirely plausible that Zimmerman approached Martin in a threatening manner or even tried to grab him, and <em>Martin</em> then acted in self defense. The fight starts, both men are punching and scuffling and shouting and rolling around on the ground, and Martin winds up "on top" at the moment that the witness first sees what is happening.</p><p></p><p>What we <em>do</em> know....is that Zimmerman <em>got out of his vehicle with a gun </em>and inititated an encounter with someone who up until that point posed <strong>no imminent threat</strong> to him or anyone else. At<em> that</em> point, he <em>lost</em> the right to claim self defense. I am not a lawyer, but my guess is that he will be up on some sort of manslaughter or negligent homicide charges. I dont think he <em>intended</em> to commit a murder, but he was <strong>reckless</strong> and <strong>grossly negligent</strong> in regards to his decision making with his weapon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 954681, member: 14668"] Even if true, it does not change the fact that Zimmerman [I]instigated[/I] the encounter by getting out of his vehicle and pursuing an individual who had not at that point committed [I]any[/I] sort of crime. We also do not know if the witness saw the [I]entire[/I] encounter from start to finish, or only what happened [I]after[/I] Zimmerman and Martin began fighting. It is entirely plausible that Zimmerman approached Martin in a threatening manner or even tried to grab him, and [I]Martin[/I] then acted in self defense. The fight starts, both men are punching and scuffling and shouting and rolling around on the ground, and Martin winds up "on top" at the moment that the witness first sees what is happening. What we [I]do[/I] know....is that Zimmerman [I]got out of his vehicle with a gun [/I]and inititated an encounter with someone who up until that point posed [B]no imminent threat[/B] to him or anyone else. At[I] that[/I] point, he [I]lost[/I] the right to claim self defense. I am not a lawyer, but my guess is that he will be up on some sort of manslaughter or negligent homicide charges. I dont think he [I]intended[/I] to commit a murder, but he was [B]reckless[/B] and [B]grossly negligent[/B] in regards to his decision making with his weapon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
guns
Top